Environmental, Health, and Equity Co-benefits in Urban Climate Action Plans: A Descriptive Analysis for 27 C40 Member Cities

被引:3
作者
Johnson, Lauren [1 ]
Krisko, Perrin [1 ]
Malik, Maha [1 ]
O'Donnell, Catherine [1 ]
Pendleton, Nick [1 ]
Ahn, Doyeon [1 ]
Bizberg, Andrea [2 ]
Chafe, Zoe A. [2 ]
Kim, Daniel [3 ]
McCormick, Sabrina [1 ]
Naidoo, Seneca [2 ]
Anenberg, Susan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Milken Inst Sch Publ Hlth, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] C40 Cities Leadership Grp, New York, NY USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Achtenberg Sch Publ Policy & Publ Adm, Washington, DC USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES | 2022年 / 4卷
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
climate change; health; environmental health; environmental policy; air quality; MITIGATION; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.3389/frsc.2022.869203
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many actions to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) in cities have benefits for environmental quality, public health, and equity. These local and immediate "co-benefits" can include cleaner air, expanded green space, improved physical activity, and reduced noise. However, progress incorporating co-benefits assessments into climate mitigation planning has been limited. Here, we capitalized on the new availability of climate action plans (CAPs) from dozens of C40 cities to explore the stated role of environmental quality, health, and equity in urban GHG mitigation planning. Specifically, we qualitatively reviewed how four topics-equity, exposure to environmental risk factors, health effects of climate change, and health co-benefits of GHG mitigation-were addressed in CAPs from 27 C40 member cities. The cities span Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We found that more references pertained to exposures (57% of all identified references across the four topics) than to equity (21%), health co-benefits of GHG mitigation (15%), or health effects of climate change (7%). On average across all cities, five exposure categories represented the majority of exposure references: green space (23% of total coded exposure references), disasters (20%), physical activity (24%), heat (16%), and air quality (12%). Approximately two-thirds of health effects and health co-benefits references noted a link with health generally, without specificity to disease or other health outcome. Our results indicate that while environmental quality is commonly considered in CAPs, health effects of climate change and health co-benefits of GHG mitigation are mentioned less frequently. Future work should further develop methods to qualitatively and quantitatively assess health consequences of action and inaction to reduce GHG emissions, using approaches that are appropriate for and accessible to multiple levels of governments.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 69 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Greenhouse gas emissions interactive dashboard. Online dataset
[3]  
Bloomberg Associates, 2020, ACC CLIM ACT CIT RES
[4]  
C40 Cities, 2021, CIT JOH CLIM ACT PLA
[5]  
C40 Cities, 2020, HOUST CLIM ACT PLAN
[6]  
C40 Cities, 2018, LOND ENV STRAT
[7]  
C40 Cities, 2020, ROTT CLIM ACT PLAN
[8]  
C40 Cities, 2022, LAT RES
[9]  
C40 Cities, 2018, ZER CARB LOND 1 5C C
[10]  
C40 Cities, 2020, NEW YORK INCL CLIM A