Somatic Genome Editing with the Use of AI: Big Promises but Doubled Legal Issues

被引:0
作者
Kiseleva, Anastasiya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Subgrp Hlth & Ageing Law Lab HALL, Res Grp Law Sci Technol & Soc LSTS, Pl laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] CY Cergy Paris Univ, ETIS Res Lab, 33 Blvd Port, F-95000 Cergy, France
关键词
artificial intelligence; genome editing; medical devices; advanced therapy medicinal products; clinical trials; marketing authorisation; post-market surveillance; pharmacovigilance; CRISPR-CAS9;
D O I
10.1163/15718093-BJA10079
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Both Artificial Intelligence ('AI') and genome editing are technologies that on their own promise to revolutionise healthcare. But their common application can facilitate progress in the field even more. Multiplied benefits go along with increased risks. In this article, I identify and analyse legal challenges associated with applying AI facilities in medicinal products based on somatic genome editing. These challenges are caused by several factors. First, the two technologies share the characteristics that create and facilitate common risks. Second, each of the technologies is subject to very complex regulatory frameworks. These frameworks are not substantially connected to control the safety and quality of the common product. The main argument of this paper is that the management of common risks is only possible through common procedures. I discover the gaps in the current legislation that prevent from establishing these common procedures and provide recommendations to fill them in.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 408
页数:28
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] European Commission, 2021, COM2021206FINAL
  • [12] European Medicine Agency,, HUM REG MED DEV
  • [13] European Medicines Agency, 2011, EMA3547852010
  • [14] Regulatory Framework for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Europe and United States
    Iglesias-Lopez, Carolina
    Agusti, Antonia
    Obach, Marce
    Vallano, Antonio
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [15] JOHNSON W, 2017, OPTIMIZE HUMAN BIOL
  • [16] The Mythos of Model Interpretability
    Lipton, Zachary C.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2018, 61 (10) : 36 - 43
  • [17] Margulies E., NONCODING DNA
  • [18] Morange M., 2013, BLACK BOX BIOL HIST, V2nd
  • [19] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2017, HUM GEN ED SCI ETH, DOI 10.17226/24623
  • [20] CRISPR-Cas9 and the non-germline non-controversy
    Polcz, Sarah
    Lewis, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES, 2016, 3 (02): : 413 - 425