Myocardial protection by glucoseinsulinpotassium in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing urgent multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

被引:13
|
作者
Shim, J. -K. [1 ]
Yang, S. -Y. [3 ]
Yoo, Y. -C. [1 ]
Yoo, K. -J. [2 ]
Kwak, Y. -L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Anaesthesia & Pain Res Inst, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul 156756, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Biomed Sci Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; insulin; myocardial injury; OPCAB; troponin T; GLUCOSE-INSULIN-POTASSIUM; CARDIAC-SURGERY; ON-PUMP; GRAFT-SURGERY; RISK; THERAPY; CLOPIDOGREL; ISCHEMIA; TROPONIN; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aes324
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The aim of this randomized and controlled trial was to investigate the effect of a glucoseinsulinpotassium (GIK) solution on myocardial protection in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing urgent multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated either to receive 0.3 ml kg(1) h(2) GIK solution (potassium 80 mEq and regular insulin 325 IU in 500 ml of 50 glucose) or equivalent volume of normal saline (control) upon anaesthetic induction until 6 h after reperfusion. The primary endpoints were to compare the concentrations of creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin-T between the groups after reperfusion. The secondary endpoints were to compare the incidences of postoperative troponin-T 0.8 ng ml(1) and myocardial infarction (MI) between the groups. Highest CK-MB [8.7 (4.4) vs 13.1 (7.9) ng ml(1), P0.006] and troponin-T [0.20 (0.130.49) vs 0.48 (0.180.91) ng ml(1), P0.0001] values after reperfusion were significantly lower in the GIK group compared with the control group. The area under the curve of serially measured troponin-T was also significantly smaller in the GIK group compared with the control group [0.83 (0.431.81) vs 0.46 (0.311.00), P0.036]. Significantly fewer patients in the GIK group showed troponin-T 0.8 ng ml(1) after reperfusion compared with the control group (3 vs 11, P0.033). The incidence of postoperative MI was similar between the groups. GIK administration in ACS patients undergoing urgent multivessel OPCAB significantly attenuated the degree of ensuing myocardial injury without complications related to glycaemic control. Clinical Trial Registry. URL: . Unique identification number NCT01384656.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery
    Hong, D. M.
    Min, J. J.
    Kim, J. H.
    Sohn, I. S.
    Lim, T. W.
    Lim, Y. J.
    Bahk, J. -H.
    Jeon, Y.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (05) : 924 - 929
  • [22] Simultaneous Hybrid Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
    Hu, Shengshou
    Li, Qi
    Gao, Peixian
    Xiong, Hui
    Zheng, Zhe
    Li, Lihuan
    Xu, Bo
    Gao, Runlin
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 91 (02): : 432 - 438
  • [23] Early outcomes in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
    Agarwal, Gautam Rampratap
    Krishna, Neethu
    Raveendran, Greeshma
    Jose, Rajesh
    Padmanabhan, Murukan
    Jayant, Aveek
    Varma, Praveen Kerala
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 35 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [24] Multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a nonagenarian: anesthesiologic management
    Crivellari, A.
    Landoni, G.
    Bellotti, F.
    Cedrati, V.
    Scandroglio, A. M.
    Boroli, F.
    Gerli, C.
    Zangrillo, A.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2006, 72 (12) : 1001 - 1003
  • [25] Reengineering towards Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Albert, A.
    Ennker, J.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2007, 21 (01): : 39 - 43
  • [26] Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning With Postconditioning in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery - Randomized Controlled Trial -
    Hong, Deok Man
    Jeon, Yunseok
    Lee, Chang-Soon
    Kim, Hyun Joo
    Lee, Jung-Man
    Bahk, Jae-Hyon
    Kim, Ki-Bong
    Hwang, Ho Young
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (04) : 884 - 890
  • [27] The effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass on mortality after acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis
    Harling, Leanne
    Moscarelli, Marco
    Kidher, Emaddin
    Fattouch, Khalil
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 169 (05) : 339 - 348
  • [28] Vorapaxar in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
    Whellan, David J.
    Tricoci, Pierluigi
    Chen, Edmond
    Huang, Zhen
    Leibowitz, David
    Vranckx, Pascal
    Marhefka, Gregary D.
    Held, Claes
    Nicolau, Jose C.
    Storey, Robert F.
    Ruzyllo, Witold
    Huber, Kurt
    Sinnaeve, Peter
    Weiss, A. Teddy
    Dery, Jean-Pierre
    Moliterno, David J.
    Van de Werf, Frans
    Aylward, Philip E.
    White, Harvey D.
    Armstrong, Paul W.
    Wallentin, Lars
    Strony, John
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (11) : 1048 - 1057
  • [29] Is off-pump superior to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease?
    Emmert, Maximilian Y.
    Salzberg, Sacha P.
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Rodriguez, Hector
    Plass, Andre
    Hoerstrup, Simon P.
    Gruenenfelder, Juerg
    Falk, Volkmar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (01) : 233 - 239
  • [30] Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?
    Ofoegbu, Chima K. P.
    Manganyi, Rodgers M.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (02) : 64 - 77