Effect of Physician Training on the X-Ray Dose Delivered During Coronary Angioplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Ramon Azpiri-Lopez, Jose [1 ]
Luis Assad-Morell, Jose [1 ]
Gerardo Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Jose [2 ]
Elizondo-Riojas, Guillermo [3 ]
Davila-Bortoni, Adrian [1 ]
Garcia-Martinez, Rodrigo [1 ]
Trevino-Frutos, Ramon [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad Monterre, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Fac Med, Subdirecc Invest, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[3] Univ Autonoma Nuevo Leon, Fac Med, Ctr Univ Imagen Diagnost, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
来源
JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY | 2013年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
percutaneous coronary intervention; radiation exposure; radiation safety; dose reference level; reference point air kerma; kerma area product; dosimetry; RADIATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; REDUCTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To assess whether physician training helps decrease the amount of radiation delivered to patients undergoing coronary angioplasty with stent placement. Background. Coronary angioplasty exposes patients to high doses of ionizing radiation, possibly related to equipment misuse or inappropriate training. Methods. Reference point air kerma (K-a,K-r) and kerma area product (P-KA) were prospectively registered during a period of 6 months in patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty with stent ad hoc. All interventionalists were then invited to an informative conference on appropriate use of radiation and changes in x-ray delivery settings. Data were recorded during the following 6 months and then compared for the whole group and for those who did or did not attend the conference. Results. K-a,K-r decreased from 5.44 +/- 0.3 Gy (n = 106) to 3.39 +/- 0.22 Gy (n = 112); P<.0001 and P-KA decreased from 365.4 +/- 21.1 Gy.cm(-2) to 233.7 +/- 13.1 Gy.cm(-2); P<.0001. During the first 6 months, there were no differences in radiation emitted among physicians; however, during the second half of the study, there was a 34% difference in K-a,K-r between those that attended the conference and those who did not (2.78 +/- 0.23 Gy vs 4.18 +/- 0.37 Gy; P = .002), regardless of the fact that both groups lowered radiation emission settings. Conclusion. Changes in x-ray parameters profoundly reduce the amount of radiation delivered to patients, a situation that was more evident in those who attended an informative conference. It is important to educate cardiologists in the appropriate use of modern x-ray equipment. J INVASIVE CARDIOL 2013;25(3):109-113
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 113
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effect of Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy on the X-ray Dose during Coronary Intervention
    Sadamatsu, Kenji
    Nakano, Yasuhiro
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 55 (15) : 1943 - 1946
  • [2] X-ray dose to the skin in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
    Miralbell, R
    Doriot, PA
    Nouet, P
    Rouzaud, M
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 50 (03) : 300 - 306
  • [3] Dose in x-ray computed tomography
    Kalender, Willi A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (03): : R129 - R150
  • [4] Comparison and calibration of dose delivered by 137Cs and x-ray irradiators in mice
    Caravaca, Javier
    Peter, Robin
    Yang, Jaewon
    Gunther, Chad
    Serrano, Juan Antonio Camara
    Nostrand, Christopher
    Steri, Veronica
    Seo, Youngho
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (22):
  • [5] Effect of X-ray protective visors on the eye lens dose during ureteroscopy
    Zoeller, G.
    Konstanz, V
    Broenner, J.
    Hoedlmoser, H.
    UROLOGE, 2020, 59 (10): : 1231 - 1236
  • [6] The Impact of Novel X-Ray Systems and X-Ray System Optimization on Patient Radiation Dose Administered During Cardiac Catheterization
    Vemmou, Evangelia
    Nikolakopoulos, Ilias
    Xenogiannis, Iosif
    Megaly, Michael
    Omer, Mohamed A.
    Stanberry, Larissa
    Garberich, Ross
    Rangan, Bavana, V
    Baran, Kenneth W.
    Gossl, Mario
    Sorajja, Paul
    Chavez, Ivan
    Mooney, Michael
    Traverse, Jay
    Wang, Yale
    Garcia, Santiago
    Poulose, Anil
    Burke, M. Nicholas
    Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (06): : 218 - 221
  • [7] Image intensifier X-ray beam collimation and its effect on radiation dose during ureteroscopy
    Horsburgh, Ben A.
    Babajews, Wesley
    Altham, Samantha
    Cowan, Helen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2016, 9 (05) : 335 - 339
  • [8] Effect of Radiation Monitoring Method and Formula Differences on Estimated Physician Dose during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Chida, K.
    Morishima, Y.
    Masuyama, H.
    Chiba, H.
    Katahira, Y.
    Inaba, Y.
    Mori, I.
    Maruoka, S.
    Takahashi, S.
    Kohzuki, M.
    Zuguchi, M.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [9] Temporal Trends in X-Ray Exposure during Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Davidsen, Cedric
    Bolstad, Kirsten
    Nygaard, Ellisif
    Vikenes, Kjell
    Rotevatn, Svein
    Tuseth, Vegard
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [10] Rotational x-ray coronary angiography
    Raman, SV
    Morford, R
    Neff, M
    Attar, TT
    Kukielka, G
    Magorien, RD
    Bush, CA
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (02) : 201 - 207