The fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), a marker of response to chemoradiotherapy in breast cancer?

被引:11
作者
Massabeau, Carole [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte [4 ]
Belin, Lisa [5 ]
Savignoni, Alexia [5 ]
Richardson, Marion
Kirova, Youlia M. [2 ]
Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal, Elizabeth [1 ]
Megnin-Chanet, Frederique [3 ,6 ]
Hall, Janet [3 ,6 ]
Fourquet, Alain [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Claudius Regaud, Dept Radiat Oncol, F-31052 Toulouse, France
[2] Inst Curie, Dept Radiat Oncol, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] INSERM U612, F-91405 Orsay, France
[4] Inst Curie, Dept Tumor Biol, F-75005 Paris, France
[5] Inst Curie, Dept Biostat, F-75005 Paris, France
[6] Inst Curie, F-91405 Orsay, France
关键词
Breast radioresistance; Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1); Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2); Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Predictive marker; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; RADIATION-THERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; EXPRESSION; DOXORUBICIN; PACLITAXEL; CARCINOMA; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-012-2027-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The goal of the present study was to evaluate the role of the tyrosine kinase receptor fibroblast growth factor-1 (FGFR1) and its ligand, the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) in determining the response to chemoradiotherapy of breast cancers. S14 was a phase II neoadjuvant study carried out at the Institut Curie that recruited 59 patients between November 2001 and September 2003. This prospective study aimed to assess the pathological response after preoperative radiochemotherapy (5FU-Navelbine-radiotherapy) for large breast cancers. The expression of FGFR1 and FGF2 in tumor cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Tumors in which no staining was seen, were considered as negative for that protein. We used the Khi-2 test or the Fisher test to compare the qualitative variables and the Student t test or the non-parametric Wilcoxon test for the quantitative variables. We included in the present study all the 32 patients from the S14 cohort for whom the tissue blocks from the biopsy specimens were available with sufficient tumoral tissue. FGFR1 and FGF2 staining were observed respectively in 17 (56 %) and 22 (68 %) of the 32 tumoral biopsies. The expression of FGFR1 was associated with the hormone receptor positive status (p = 0.0191). Only 11 % (1/9) of the high grade tumors failed to respond to chemoradiotherapy compared to 68 % resistant tumors (15/22) among the low/intermediate grade tumors (p = 0.0199). Among the low/intermediate grade tumors, FGFR1 negative tumors did not respond to chemoradiotherapy (0/9), compared with tumors expressing FGFR1 among which, almost one half had a good response (6/13) (p = 0.0167). Among the low and intermediate grade breast cancers, the FGFR1 negative tumors were resistant to chemoradiotherapy. The expression of FGFR1 in patients' biopsies may serve as a marker of response to chemoradiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]  
SATALOFF DM, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P297
[32]   NEOADJUVANT VERSUS ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN PREMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS WITH TUMORS CONSIDERED TOO LARGE FOR BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL - S6 [J].
SCHOLL, SM ;
FOURQUET, A ;
ASSELAIN, B ;
PIERGA, JY ;
VILCOQ, JR ;
DURAND, JC ;
DORVAL, T ;
PALANGIE, T ;
JOUVE, M ;
BEUZEBOC, P ;
GARCIOGIRALT, E ;
SALMON, RJ ;
DELAROCHEFORDIERE, A ;
CAMPANA, F ;
POUILLART, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) :645-652
[33]   PRIMARY (NEOADJUVANT) CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY COMPARED WITH PRIMARY RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN STAGE IIB-IIIA BREAST-CANCER [J].
SEMIGLAZOV, VF ;
TOPUZOV, EE ;
BAVLI, JL ;
MOISEYENKO, VM ;
IVANOVA, OA ;
SELEZNEV, IK ;
ORLOV, AA ;
BARASH, NY ;
GOLUBEVA, OM ;
CHEPIC, OF .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (07) :591-595
[34]   Upregulation of basic fibroblast growth factor in breast carcinoma and its relationship to vascular density, oestrogen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor and survival [J].
Smith, K ;
Fox, SB ;
Whitehouse, R ;
Taylor, M ;
Greenall, M ;
Clarke, J ;
Harris, AL .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (06) :707-713
[35]   Gene expression signature predicting pathologic complete response with gemcitabine, epirubicin, and docetaxel in primary breast cancer [J].
Thuerigen, O ;
Schneeweiss, A ;
Toedt, G ;
Warnat, P ;
Hahn, M ;
Kramer, H ;
Brors, B ;
Rudlowski, C ;
Benner, A ;
Schuetz, F ;
Tews, B ;
Eils, R ;
Sinn, HP ;
Sohn, C ;
Lichter, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (12) :1839-1845
[36]   FGFR1 Amplification Drives Endocrine Therapy Resistance and Is a Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer [J].
Turner, Nicholas ;
Pearson, Alex ;
Sharpe, Rachel ;
Lambros, Maryou ;
Geyer, Felipe ;
Lopez-Garcia, Maria A. ;
Natrajan, Rachael ;
Marchio, Caterina ;
Iorns, Elizabeth ;
Mackay, Alan ;
Gillett, Cheryl ;
Grigoriadis, Anita ;
Tutt, Andrew ;
Reis-Filho, Jorge S. ;
Ashworth, Alan .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70 (05) :2085-2094
[37]   Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer [J].
Turner, Nicholas ;
Grose, Richard .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2010, 10 (02) :116-129
[38]   LOCAL-CONTROL OF OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER AFTER RADIOTHERAPY ALONE [J].
VANLIMBERGEN, E ;
VANDERSCHUEREN, E ;
VANDENBOGAERT, W ;
VANWING, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 26 (06) :674-679
[39]   Calibration of immunohistochemistry for assessment of HER2 in breast cancer:: results of the French Multicentre GEFPICS Study [J].
Vincent-Salomon, A ;
MacGrogan, G ;
Couturier, J ;
Arnould, L ;
Denoux, Y ;
Fiche, M ;
Jacquemier, J ;
Mathieu, MC ;
Penault-Llorca, F ;
Rigaud, C ;
Roger, P ;
Treilleux, I ;
Vilain, MO ;
Mathoulin-Pélissier, S ;
Le Doussal, V .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 42 (04) :337-347
[40]   Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer:: The GEPARDUO Study of the German Breast Group [J].
von Minckwitz, G ;
Raab, G ;
Caputo, A ;
Schütte, M ;
Hilfrich, F ;
Blohmer, JU ;
Gerber, B ;
Costa, SD ;
Merkle, E ;
Eidtmann, H ;
Lampe, D ;
Jackisch, C ;
du Bois, A ;
Kaufmann, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (12) :2676-2685