Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus as a screening tool to detect osteoporosis - Different reference ranges for Caucasian women, African American women, and Caucasian men

被引:11
作者
Rothenberg, RJ
Boyd, JL
Holcomb, JR
机构
[1] Northeastern Ohio Univ, Coll Med, Youngstown, OH 44501 USA
[2] Forum Hlth Care, Youngstown, OH 44501 USA
[3] Youngstown State Univ, Youngstown, OH 44555 USA
[4] Cleveland State Univ, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
关键词
fractures; osteoporosis; quantitative ultrasound; race; sex; T-score;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:7:1:101
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The interpretation of results measured by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel depends on the population studied. We measured estimated bone mineral density (BMD) of the heel using the Hologic Sahara sonometer. People were studied at county fairs, health fairs, and churches. Subjects were not on treatments that would affect bone density, other than calcium supplementation. This included 823 Caucasian women, 131 African American women, and 301 Caucasian men. In contrast to women, for Caucasian men the squared term for age was not significant, and a straight line of decline was the best fit for estimated BMD. African American women had a standard deviation larger than that reported by Hologic for Caucasian women. We compared a history of self-reported fractures with a subject's estimated BMD. An estimated BMD of 0.57 gm/cm(2) included 75% of all fractures. This cutoff point was associated with increased fracture prevalence in subjects over age 50, relative risk of 1.4. This result corresponds to the Hologic data T-score of -0.2. When used as a screening tool for osteoporosis fracture risk, an estimated BMD of 0.57 gm/cm2 seems reasonable in those subjects over age 50.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Reconciling quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus with X-ray-based measurements of the central skeleton [J].
Ayers, M ;
Prince, M ;
Ahmadi, S ;
Baran, DT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (09) :1850-1855
[2]   Peripheral or central densitometry: Does it matter which technique we use? [J].
Blake, GM ;
Fogelman, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (02) :83-96
[3]   Physician treatment of osteoporosis in response to heel ultrasound bone mineral density reports [J].
Boyd, JL ;
Holcomb, JP ;
Rothenberg, RJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2002, 5 (04) :375-381
[4]  
Boyd JL, 2000, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V13, P330, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200010)13:5<330::AID-ANR13>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-B
[6]  
Castro CHD, 2000, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V11, P923
[7]  
*CLIN US GUID HOL, 1998, SAHARA CLIN BON SON, P5
[8]   Relative contributions of testosterone and estrogen in regulating bone resorption and formation in normal elderly men [J].
Falahati-Nini, A ;
Riggs, BL ;
Atkinson, EJ ;
O'Fallon, WM ;
Eastell, R ;
Khosla, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2000, 106 (12) :1553-1560
[9]   Discordance in patient classification using T-scores [J].
Faulkner, KG ;
von Stetten, E ;
Miller, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1999, 2 (03) :343-350
[10]   Reference data in a Swiss population -: Discordance in patient classification using T-scores among calcaneum, spine, and femur [J].
Hans, D ;
Rizzoli, R ;
Thiébaud, D ;
Lippuner, K ;
Allaoua, S ;
Genton, L ;
Luzuy, F ;
Krieg, MA ;
Jaeger, P ;
Slosman, DO .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2001, 4 (04) :291-298