Intercomparison of three- and one-dimensional model simulations and aircraft observations of stratocumulus

被引:65
作者
Duynkerke, PG
Jonker, PJ
Chlond, A
Van Zanten, MC
Cuxart, J
Clark, P
Sanchez, E
Martin, G
Lenderink, G
Teixeira, J
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, NL-3584 CC Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[3] INM, Serv Predicc Numer, Madrid 28040, Spain
[4] Univ Manchester, Dept Phys, Atmospher Phys Grp, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
[5] UK Meteorol Off, Hadley Ctr, Bracknell RG12 2SY, Berks, England
[6] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[7] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading RG2 9AX, Berks, England
关键词
closure models; drizzle; entrainment; Large Eddy Simulation; observations; stratocumulus; turbulence;
D O I
10.1023/A:1002006919256
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
As part of the EUropean Cloud REsolving Modelling (EUCREM) model intercomparison project we compared the properties and development of stratocumulus as revealed by actual observations and as derived from two types of models, namely three-dimensional Large Eddy Simulations (LES) and one-dimensional Single Column Models (SCMs). The turbulence, microphysical and radiation properties were obtained from observations made in solid stratocumulus during the third flight of the first 'Lagrangian' experiment of the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX). The goal of the intercomparison was to study the turbulence and microphysical properties of a stratocumulus layer with specified initial and boundary conditions. The LES models predict an entrainment velocity which is significantly larger than estimated from observations. Because the observed value contains a large experimental uncertainty no definitive conclusions can be drawn from this. The LES modelled buoyancy flux agrees rather well with the observed values, which indicates that the intensity of the convection is modelled correctly. From LES it was concluded that the inclusion of drizzle had a small influence (about 10%) on the buoyancy flux. All SCMs predict a solid stratocumulus layer with the correct liquid water profile. However, the buoyancy flux profile is poorly represented in these models. From the comparison with observations it is clear that there is considerable uncertainty in the parametrization of drizzle in both SCM and LES.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 487
页数:35
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
ALBRECHT BA, 1995, B AM METEOROL SOC, V76, P889, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<0889:TASTE>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
[Anonymous], The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-5: Model description
[4]  
Bechtold P, 1996, B AM METEOROL SOC, V77, P2033
[5]  
BELJAARS ACM, 1993, ECMWF SEM P VAL MOD, V2, P159
[6]  
BOUGEAULT P, 1995, MESO NH ATMOSPHERIC, pCH13
[7]   A parameterisation of the effective radius of ice free clouds for use in global climate models [J].
Bower, K. N. ;
Choularton, T. W. .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 1992, 27 (04) :305-339
[8]   SENSITIVITY OF A GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL TO PARAMETERIZATIONS OF CLOUD-TURBULENCE INTERACTIONS IN THE ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
BRINKOP, S ;
ROECKNER, E .
TELLUS SERIES A-DYNAMIC METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1995, 47 (02) :197-220
[9]   3-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATION OF CLOUD STREET DEVELOPMENT DURING A COLD AIR OUTBREAK [J].
CHLOND, A .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1992, 58 (1-2) :161-200
[10]  
CHLOND A, 1994, MON WEATHER REV, V122, P111, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0111:LMVOBA>2.0.CO