Anesthesiologist Specialization and Use of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

被引:26
作者
Cobb, Benjamin T. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Lane-Fall, Meghan B. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Month, Richard C. [1 ]
Onuoha, Onyi C. [1 ]
Srinivas, Sindhu K. [2 ]
Neuman, Mark D. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Ctr Perioperat Outcomes Res & Transformat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
FAILED TRACHEAL INTUBATION; SECTION; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0000000000002534
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Guidelines for obstetric anesthesia recommend neuraxial anesthesia (i.e., spinal or epidural block) for cesarean delivery in most patients. Little is known about the association of anesthesiologist specialization in obstetric anesthesia with a patient's likelihood of receiving general anesthesia. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare utilization of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery among patients treated by generalist versus obstetric-specialized anesthesiologists. Methods: The authors studied patients undergoing cesarean delivery for live singleton pregnancies from 2013 through 2017 at one academic medical center. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The authors estimated the association of anesthesiologist specialization in obstetric anesthesia with the odds of receiving general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Results: Of the cesarean deliveries in our sample, 2,649 of 4,052 (65.4%) were performed by obstetric-specialized anesthesiologists, and 1,403 of 4,052 (34.6%) by generalists. Use of general anesthesia differed for patients treated by specialists and generalists (7.3% vs. 12.1%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, the odds of receiving general anesthesia were lower among patients treated by obstetric-specialized anesthesiologists among all patients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92; P = 0.011), and in a subgroup analysis restricted to urgent or emergent cesarean deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.99; P = 0.049). There was no association between provider specialization and the odds of receiving general anesthesia in a subgroup analysis restricted to evening or weekend deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.03; P = 0.085). Conclusions: Treatment by an obstetric anesthesiologist was associated with lower odds of receiving general anesthesia for cesarean delivery; however, this finding did not persist in a subgroup analysis restricted to evening and weekend deliveries.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 246
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology [J].
Apfelbaum J.L. ;
Hawkins J.L. ;
Agarkar M. ;
Bucklin B.A. ;
Connis R.T. ;
Gambling D.R. ;
Mhyre J. ;
Nickinovich D.G. ;
Sherman H. ;
Tsen L.C. ;
Yaghmour E.T.A. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 124 (02) :270-300
[2]   Ethnic disparities among patients undergoing general anesthesia for cesarean delivery [J].
Butwick, Alexander ;
Blumenfeld, Yair ;
Brookfield, Kathleen ;
Weiniger, Carolyn .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) :S259-S259
[3]  
Campbell DC, 2009, CAN J ANAESTH, V56, P19, DOI 10.1007/s12630-008-9004-7
[4]   Serious Complications Related to Obstetric Anesthesia The Serious Complication Repository Project of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology [J].
D'Angelo, Robert ;
Smiley, Richard M. ;
Riley, Edward T. ;
Segal, Scott .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 120 (06) :1505-1512
[5]  
Dindelli M, 1991, Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat, V112, P376
[6]   Choice of Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: An Analysis of the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry [J].
Juang, Jeremy ;
Gabriel, Rodney A. ;
Dutton, Richard P. ;
Palanisamy, Arvind ;
Urman, Richard D. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2017, 124 (06) :1914-1917
[7]   A prospective audit of regional anaesthesia failure in 5080 Caesarean sections [J].
Kinsella, S. M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (08) :822-832
[8]   Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review [J].
Kinsella, S. M. ;
Winton, A. L. ;
Mushambi, M. C. ;
Ramaswamy, K. ;
Swales, H. ;
Quinn, A. C. ;
Popat, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2015, 24 (04) :356-374
[9]   Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification [J].
Lucas, DN ;
Yentis, SM ;
Kinsella, SM ;
Holdcroft, A ;
May, AE ;
Wee, M ;
Robinson, PN .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2000, 93 (07) :346-350
[10]  
MERRILL R B, 1951, Curr Res Anesth Analg, V30, P121