Trial-based clinical and economic analyses: the unhelpful quest for conformity

被引:22
作者
Whitehurst, David G. T. [1 ,2 ]
Bryan, Stirling [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
[2] Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Evaluat, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
关键词
Randomized controlled trial; Economic evaluation; Outcomes measurement; Cost-utility analysis; Scientific paradigms; Estimation; Inference; PRIMARY-CARE; ALONGSIDE; ACUPUNCTURE;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-14-421
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Where there is conformity across the findings, interpretation and implications of 'clinical' and 'economic' research, there is limited cause for concern. However, there is often unease when apparent contradictory conclusions are drawn from the same study. Given the ever increasing role for economic evaluation in healthcare decision making, this commentary challenges the necessity of compatibility between clinical and economic evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[2]   Practical guidelines for economic evaluations alongside equivalence trials [J].
Bosmans, Judith E. ;
de Bruijne, Martine C. ;
van Hout, Hein P. J. ;
Hermens, Marleen L. M. ;
Ader, Herman J. ;
van Tulder, Maurits W. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (02) :251-258
[3]   Economic evaluation and clinical trials: size matters - The need for greater power in cost analyses poses an ethical dilemma [J].
Briggs, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7273) :1362-1363
[4]   The death of cost-minimization analysis? [J].
Briggs, AH ;
O'Brien, BJ .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2001, 10 (02) :179-184
[5]   The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies [J].
Claxton, K .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1999, 18 (03) :341-364
[6]   Specifying objectives and outcomes for clinical trials [J].
Gebski, V ;
Marschner, I ;
Keech, AC .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (10) :491-492
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[8]  
Kuhn T.S., 2012, The structures of scientific revolutions
[9]   Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population [J].
Lee, Bonsan Bonne ;
King, Madeleine T. ;
Simpson, Judy M. ;
Haran, Mark J. ;
Stockler, Martin R. ;
Marial, Obaydullah ;
Salkeld, Glenn .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (04) :680-688
[10]   Using Instrument-Defined Health State Transitions to Estimate Minimally Important Differences for Four Preference-Based Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments [J].
Luo, Nan ;
Johnson, Jeffrey A. ;
Coons, Stephen Joel .
MEDICAL CARE, 2010, 48 (04) :365-371