Supporting smallholders' decision making: managing trade-offs and synergies for sustainable agricultural intensification

被引:31
作者
Adolph, Barbara [1 ]
Allen, Mary [2 ]
Beyuo, Evans [3 ]
Banuoku, Daniel [3 ]
Barrett, Sam [1 ]
Bourgou, Tsuamba [4 ]
Bwanausi, Ndapile
Dakyaga, Francis [5 ]
Derbile, Emmanuel K. [5 ]
Gubbels, Peter [6 ]
Hie, Batchene [7 ]
Kachamba, Chancy
Naazie, Godwin Kumpong [5 ]
Niber, Ebenezer Betiera [3 ]
Nyirengo, Isaac [8 ]
Tampulu, Samuel Faamuo [3 ]
Zongo, Alex-Fabrice [9 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Environm & Dev, London, England
[2] Pract Act West Africa, Dakar, Senegal
[3] Ctr Indigenous Knowledge & Org Dev, Wa, Ghana
[4] Groundswell Int, Fada Ngourma, Burkina Faso
[5] Univ Dev Studies, Wa, Ghana
[6] Groundswell Int, Wa, Ghana
[7] Assoc Nourrir Sans Detruire, Fada Ngourma, Burkina Faso
[8] Total LandCare, Lilongwe, Malawi
[9] Inst Environm & Rech Agr, Fada Ngourma, Burkina Faso
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Ghana; Burkina Faso; Malawi; trade-offs; risk; decision making; sustainability; lock-in; choices; AFRICA;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2020.1786947
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Meeting multiple, often competing objectives when seeking to sustainably intensify their agricultural operations is a constant challenge for smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Trade-offs between social, economic and environmental goals at different time and spatial scales need to be reconciled, making best use of scarce resources. This study explored how different types of farm households in Northwest Ghana, Eastern Burkina Faso and Central Malawi make choices about resource allocation and farming strategies, and how they manage the trade-offs encountered. It used both quantitative (questionnaire survey) and qualitative (household case studies) methods to identify trade-offs experienced by farmers and to analyse trade-off management strategies used by them. The 10 main trade-offs identified across the 3 countries occurred across sustainability domains, across time, across spatial scales, across types of farmers or a combination of these. Famers were disincentivized from prioritizing long-term sustainability in their farming operation by resource constraints to meet multiple farming and livelihood objectives, mainstream agricultural policies encouraging short-term productivity gains and adoption-focused interventions, which disregard the diversity of farming households.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 473
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Adolph B., 1993, ICRA WORKING DOCUMEN, V28
[2]  
African Smallholder Farmers Group (ASFG), 2013, SUPP SMALLH FARM AFR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, UNIFORMITY DIVERSITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE WO
[5]  
Bandel T, 2018, TRUE COST MAIZE PROD
[6]  
Biovision Foundation for Ecological Development and IPES-Food, 2020, MON FLOWS WHAT IS HO
[7]  
Boussard J-M, 1992, 103 FAO
[8]   Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation? [J].
Byerlee, Derek ;
Stevenson, James ;
Villoria, Nelson .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 3 (02) :92-98
[9]  
Carney D., 1998, SUSTAINABLE RURAL LI
[10]   PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL (PRA) - CHALLENGES, POTENTIALS AND PARADIGM [J].
CHAMBERS, R .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 22 (10) :1437-1454