Business Process Variability and Public Values

被引:8
作者
Shishkov, Boris [1 ,3 ]
Mendling, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Math & Informat, Sofia, Bulgaria
[2] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Inst Informat Business, Vienna, Austria
[3] Inst IICREST, Sofia, Bulgaria
来源
BUSINESS MODELING AND SOFTWARE DESIGN, BMSD 2018 | 2018年 / 319卷
关键词
Business process variability; Public values; Software design; CONFIGURATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_31
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A business process is a structure of inter-related activities that are executed in order to achieve a specific business objective. Organizations often maintain multiple variants of a given business process because of changing conditions, different regulations in different countries, or other contextual factors. We aim at specifying the relationship between a generic business process and its different variants, taking the perspective of public values, such as privacy, accountability, and transparency. The business process variants in turn may be a basis for software specifications - in this, business processes would be bridging between societal demands (possibly concerning public values) and the corresponding technical (software) functionalities. Our contribution is featuring a meta-model that describes business processes on a value-independent level; they can be extended towards value-specific business process variants that can be related in turn to software architectures. We reflect this in proposed value operationalization guidelines, using concepts from business process design as a basis; those guidelines assume coming firstly through technology-independent artefacts and secondly - through technology-specific artefacts, to arrive at software specifications that are adequate with regard to public-values-related demands.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 411
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Akkermans H, 2006, RE'06: 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, P273
[2]  
Anish PR, 2015, INT REQUIR ENG CONF, P86, DOI 10.1109/RE.2015.7320411
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 17 PESOA TR
[4]  
[Anonymous], TECHNOLOGICAL FORECA
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[6]  
Baldini G., 2016, SCI ENG ETHICS
[7]  
Charfi A, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6138, P48, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13595-8_6
[8]  
Czarnecki K, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3676, P422
[9]  
Czarnecki K., 2005, INT WORKSH SOFTW FAC, P16
[10]  
Friedman B., 2017, SURVEY VALUE SENSITI, V1, P76