Undergraduate Students' Beliefs about Engineering Problem Solving

被引:59
作者
McNeill, Nathan J. [1 ]
Douglas, Elliot P. [2 ]
Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka [5 ]
Therriault, David J. [3 ]
Krause, Ilana [4 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Mesa Univ, Grand Junction, CO 81501 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Environm Engn Sci, POB 116450, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Sch Human Dev & Org Studies Educ, POB 117047, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, POB 116400, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] Arizona State Univ, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers Coll, POB 871811, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
problem solving; qualitative; grounded theory; beliefs; EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS; DESIGN PROCESSES; WORKING; CONCURRENT; EXPERTISE; KNOWLEDGE; RELEVANT; FRESHMAN; TEXTBOOK; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20150
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Problem solving is considered to be a central activity of engineering practice. While some studies have shown how various beliefs affect students' abilities to solve problems, studies are needed that explicitly examine the beliefs and assumptions students bring to the problem-solving process. Purpose/Hypothesis The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe students' engineering problem-solving processes and develop a conceptual model that illustrates students' beliefs about problem solving. Our research question was, What beliefs do students have about engineering problem solving? Design/Method We analyzed data from retrospective semistructured interviews carried out after a problem-solving session. We interviewed nine engineering students about the processes they used to solve the problems and the assumptions and beliefs that guided their problem solving. We then used grounded theory to identify and analyze statements from the interviews and to develop a conceptual model of student beliefs. Results The resulting model has five major categories: the problem-solving process itself, the role of classroom problems, the role of workplace problems, personal characteristics that affect problem solving, and resources that assist problem solving. Students identify a sharp distinction between classroom problems and workplace problems. Conclusions Our conceptual model provides an initial framework for understanding how students' beliefs affect their approaches to engineering problems. In contrast to stage models, our model shows that students' epistemic beliefs about problem solving are contextual. Future work is needed to understand the limits and extend the applicability of our model.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 584
页数:25
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks [J].
Ahmed, S ;
Wallace, KM ;
Blessing, LTM .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2003, 14 (01) :1-11
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, GEN THEORY EXPERTISE
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PARADIGM DIALOG
[5]  
[Anonymous], J ENG ED
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ENG 2020 VIS ENG NEW
[7]  
Atman C.J., 1998, Journal of Engineering Education, V87, P121, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1998.TB00332.X
[8]  
Atman C.J., 1999, DESIGN STUD, V20, P131, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00031-3
[9]   Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study [J].
Atman, CJ ;
Cardella, ME ;
Turns, J ;
Adams, R .
DESIGN STUDIES, 2005, 26 (04) :325-357
[10]   Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? [J].
Atman, CJ ;
Bursic, KM .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND CONCURRENT ENGINEERING, 1996, 8 (04) :240-250