Teaching Student Nurse Anesthetists to Respond to Simulated Anesthetic Emergencies

被引:4
作者
Henrichs, Bernadette [1 ,2 ]
Thorn, Shirley [3 ]
Thompson, Julie A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Nurse Anesthesia Program, Goldfarb Sch Nursing, Barnes Jewish Coll, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, CRNA Educ & Res, Dept Anesthesiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Cerner Corp, Populat Hlth Management, Client Dev, World Headquarters, Kansas City, MO 64117 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
关键词
anesthetic emergencies; repetitive simulation; high-fidelity simulation; computerized learning; nurse anesthetists; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; MEDICATION SAFETY; EDUCATION; SKILLS; ANESTHESIOLOGISTS; FACULTY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecns.2017.10.007
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Life-threatening complications occur during anesthetic administration and student nurse anesthetists must know how to diagnosis and treat emergencies. Using high-fidelity simulation is one teaching method. Purpose: This study compared if exposing students to the same performance criteria in simulated life-threatening anesthetic emergencies at three different intervals was statistically different from students who experienced the scenarios once. Method: Using a checklist of required actions to diagnosis and treat the emergency, two faculty members documented the responses of the control group (n = 6) and study group (n = 6) as they performed the same 13 scenarios. Results: Overall, the study group performed better on their third attempt at the scenarios than the control group who only performed the scenarios once. Conclusions: Repeating anesthetic scenarios improves the overall outcomes for students in the simulated lab environment, but the financial impact must be considered if the required curriculum changes are to become sustainable. Further studies are needed to explore alternative teaching methods such as asynchronous computerized scenarios as a supplement to high-fidelity simulation. (C) 2017 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Anderson Mindi, 2008, AORN J, V87, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.12.027
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, NOVICE EXPERT EXCELL
  • [3] [Anonymous], NURS FAC SHORT FACT
  • [4] [Anonymous], NURS ED PERSPECT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1999, TO ERR IS HUMAN BUIL
  • [6] Repetitive Pediatric Simulation Resuscitation Training
    Auerbach, Marc
    Kessler, David
    Foltin, Jessica Cooper
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (01) : 29 - 31
  • [7] Benner P., 2010, Educating nurses. A call for radical transformation
  • [8] Breyea S.C., 2010, Clinical Simulation in Nursing, V6, P169, DOI [10.1016/j.ecns.2010.01.005, DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2010.01.005]
  • [9] The effectiveness of high fidelity simulation on medical-surgical registered nurses' ability to recognise and respond to clinical emergencies
    Buckley, Thomas
    Gordon, Christopher
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2011, 31 (07) : 716 - 721
  • [10] Simulation Training and Assessment A More Efficient Method to Develop Expertise than Apprenticeship
    Cooper, Jeffrey B.
    Murray, David
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (01) : 8 - 9