Urgenda: the Final Judgment of the Dutch Supreme Court

被引:11
作者
Backes, C. W. [1 ]
van der Veen, G. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utrecht Ctr Water Oceans & Sustainabil Law UCWOSL, Environm & Planning Law, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Environm Law, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
climate change; Urgenda; tort law; public interest litigation;
D O I
10.1163/18760104-01703004
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The final verdict to the Urgenda case provided by the Dutch Supreme Court has been called a victory in the fight to limit climate change and a milestone in public interest litigation, at least in the Netherlands. As a consequence, the Dutch state will have to reduce ghg-emissions by 25% compared with 1990 at the end of 2020. The judgment has attracted widespread acclaim for being 'courageous' and exploring unknown legal territory. However, a closer look at the reasoning of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court still leaves many questions, which are address in this manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 321
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GGD RICHTL MED MIL L
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, AAE, P335
[3]   A Dutch Court's 'Revolutionary' Climate Policy Judgment: The Perversion of Judicial Power, the State's Duties of Care, and Science [J].
Bergkamp, Lucas .
JOURNAL FOR EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL & PLANNING LAW, 2015, 12 (3-4) :241-263
[4]  
Bleeker, 2018, AANSPRAKELIJKHEID KL, P4
[5]  
Bleeker T.R., 2018, NTBR, P4
[6]  
Bleeker T. R., 2017, VIJFTIG WEEFFOUTEN B
[7]   The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement [J].
Bodansky, Daniel .
REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2016, 25 (02) :142-150
[8]  
Boysen S., 2018, ZUR, P648
[9]  
de Jong E.R., 2019, MVV, P133
[10]  
Deurvorst T., 2017, GROENE SERIE ONRECHT, Vii, P121