One shot: A novel method to dilate the nephrostomy access for percutaneous lithotripsy

被引:75
作者
Frattini, A
Barbieri, A
Salsi, P
Sebastio, N
Ferretti, S
Bergamaschi, E
Cortellini, P
机构
[1] Hosp Parma, Div Urol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] Hosp Carpi, Div Urol, Carpi, Italy
[3] Univ Parma, Lab Ind Toxicol, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1089/089277901753284143
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The creation of the nephrostomy access is a fundamental step of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Dilation of the track is usually achieved with multiple incremental flexible exchange dilators of the Amplatz type, metal telescoping dilators of the Alken type, or a balloon. Currently, balloon dilation is regarded as the most modern and safest system, though it has the disadvantage of relatively high cost. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a procedure that we named "one shot," which consists of a single dilation of the track with a 25F or 30F Amplatz dilator, compares favorably in terms of efficacy, costs, and length with the other techniques of track dilation, without a significant increase in morbidity. Patients and Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent PCNL for stone disease from June 1998 to July 1999 were considered and divided into three groups according to the type of tract dilation used: A (Alken telescoping dilators), B (balloon), or C (one shot). Radiologic exposure, blood loss, and costs were evaluated. Results: The one-shot procedure compared favorably with both of the other dilation techniques without an increase in morbidity and with significant reductions in X-ray exposure and costs. Indeed, significant differences in estimated blood loss were observed between groups B and C and the minor bleeding for group C. Conclusion: Our experience indicates that one-shot dilation is feasible in the majority of patients. It is as safe and effective as the technique regarded today as the gold standard but less time consuming and less expensive. These encouraging results should be confirmed by further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 923
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   PERCUTANEOUS STONE MANIPULATION [J].
ALKEN, P ;
HUTSCHENREITER, G ;
GUNTHER, R ;
MARBERGER, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 125 (04) :463-466
[2]   NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY - PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES FOR URINARY CALCULUS REMOVAL [J].
CASTANEDAZUNIGA, WR ;
CLAYMAN, R ;
SMITH, A ;
RUSNAK, B ;
HERRERA, M ;
AMPLATZ, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (04) :721-726
[3]  
CLAYMAN RV, 1983, RADIOLOGY, V147, P884, DOI 10.1148/radiology.147.3.6844632
[4]   Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage [J].
Davidoff, R ;
Bellman, GC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (04) :1229-1231
[5]  
Goharderakhshan Reza, 2000, Journal of Urology, V163, P318
[6]   A MODIFICATION OF THE OTIS URETHROTOME AS AN AID TO FASCIAL DILATION OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY TRACTS [J].
IRETON, RC ;
GOINEY, RP ;
BOWEN, JS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04) :677-678
[7]  
PARDALIDIS NP, 1995, CONTROVERSIES ENDOUR, P159
[8]   AN IMPROVED DILATOR SYSTEM FOR PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMIES [J].
RUSNAK, B ;
CASTANEDAZUNIGA, W ;
KOTULA, F ;
HERRERA, M ;
AMPLATZ, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 144 (01) :174-174
[9]   PERCUTANEOUS LITHOTRIPSY [J].
SEGURA, JW ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
LEROY, AJ ;
MAY, GR ;
SMITH, LH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (06) :1051-1054
[10]  
Soble Jon J., 1998, Journal of Endourology, V12, pS115