Black-White Differences in Hysterectomy Prevalence: The CARDIA Study

被引:75
作者
Bower, Julie K. [1 ]
Schreiner, Pamela J. [1 ]
Sternfeld, Barbara [2 ]
Lewis, Cora E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Med, Div Prevent Med, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; RACE; AGE;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2008.133702
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We evaluated the cross-sectional association between race and hysterectomy prevalence in a population-based cohort of US women and investigated participant characteristics associated with racial differences. Methods. The cohort consisted of 1863 Black and White women in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study from 2000 to 2002 (years 15 and 16 after baseline). We used logistic regression to examine unadjusted and multivariable adjusted odds ratios. Results. Black women demonstrated greater odds of hysterectomy compared with White women (odds ratio [[OR]=3.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.52, 4.90). Adjustment for age, educational attainment, perceived barriers to accessing medical care, body mass index, polycystic ovarian syndrome, tubal ligation, depressive symptoms, age at menarche, and geographic location minimally altered the association (OR=3.70; 95% CI=2.44, 5.61). In a subset of the study population, those with directly imaged fibroids, the association was minimally attenuated (OR=3.47; 95% CI=2.23, 5.40). Conclusions. In both unadjusted and multivariable adjusted models, Black women, compared with White women, had increased odds of hysterectomy that persisted despite adjustment for participant characteristics. The increased odds are possibly related to decisions to undergo hysterectomy. (Am J Public Health. 2009;99:300-307. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.133702)
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 307
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Augustus Cheryl E, 2002, J Transcult Nurs, V13, P296, DOI 10.1177/104365902236704
[2]  
BACHMANN GA, 1990, J REPROD MED, V35, P839
[3]   The integration of a woman's perspective in hysterectomy decisions [J].
De Gelder, R ;
Richters, A ;
Peters, L .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 26 (01) :53-62
[4]   Biosocial determinants of hysterectomy in New Zealand [J].
Dharmalingam, A ;
Pool, I ;
Dickson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 90 (09) :1455-1458
[5]   CARDIA - STUDY DESIGN, RECRUITMENT, AND SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EXAMINED SUBJECTS [J].
FRIEDMAN, GD ;
CUTTER, GR ;
DONAHUE, RP ;
HUGHES, GH ;
HULLEY, SB ;
JACOBS, DR ;
LIU, K ;
SAVAGE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 41 (11) :1105-1116
[6]  
Geller SE, 1996, HEALTH SERV RES, V30, P729
[7]  
Harlow BL, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V150, P843
[8]  
Jacobs David R Jr, 1989, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V9, P448, DOI 10.1097/00008483-198911000-00003
[9]   THE SOCIOECONOMIC CORRELATES OF HYSTERECTOMIES IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
KJERULFF, K ;
LANGENBERG, P ;
GUZINSKI, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :106-108
[10]  
KJERULFF KH, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P757