Developing best practice for using Marxan to locate Marine Protected Areas in European waters

被引:52
作者
Smith, Robert J. [1 ]
Eastwood, Paul D. [2 ]
Ota, Yoshitaka [3 ]
Rogers, Stuart I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury CT2 7NR, Kent, England
[2] Cefas, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England
[3] Univ Kent, Dept Anthropol, Canterbury CT2 7NR, Kent, England
关键词
biodiversity; fisheries; marine conservation planning; reserve selection; PRIORITY CONSERVATION AREAS; KEY BIODIVERSITY AREAS; RESERVE DESIGN; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; FISHING EFFORT; SOUTH-AFRICA; UK; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; TARGETS;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fsn198
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Several recent studies have investigated the use of the conservation planning software Marxan to design Marine Protected Area (MPA) networks in UK waters. The systematic conservation planning approach embodied by Marxan has a number of advantages, but these studies have highlighted the need for guidance and advice on best practice. Here, we discuss two broad topics that we feel should inform future developments in the UK and elsewhere in the European Union. First, several technical issues need to be addressed to ensure the scientific defensibility of any conservation planning project. These include identifying which conservation features should be represented in an MPA system, developing a system for setting representation targets, and identifying which data should be included to minimize conflict with human uses of the sea. Second, it is necessary for researchers to engage at an early stage with those responsible for implementation and recognize that reserve selection should be part of a broader conservation planning process centred on a stakeholder-developed implementation strategy. A more-inclusive approach will make use of technical outputs, such as those generated by Marxan, as part of the process of policy development.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 194
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
*AEDA, 2008, DECISION POINT, V17, P8
[2]   Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas [J].
Agardy, T ;
Bridgewater, P ;
Crosby, MP ;
Day, J ;
Dayton, PK ;
Kenchington, R ;
Laffoley, D ;
McConney, P ;
Murray, PA ;
Parks, JE ;
Peau, L .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, 13 (04) :353-367
[3]  
[Anonymous], IRISH SEA PILOT REPO
[4]   Incorporating Fishermen's local knowledge and behavior into geographical information systems (GIS) for designing marine protected areas in Oceania [J].
Aswani, S ;
Lauer, M .
HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 2006, 65 (01) :81-102
[5]   Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches [J].
Austin, Mike .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (1-2) :1-19
[6]  
Ball I.R., 2000, MARXAN (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing
[7]   Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Moilanen, A .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (05) :242-248
[8]  
Connor D.W., 2006, UKSeaMap: The Mapping of Seabed and Water Column Features of U.K. Seas
[9]  
Coull K., 1998, FISHERIES SENSITIVIT
[10]   Nature conservation requires more than a passion for species [J].
Cowling, RM ;
Knight, AT ;
Faith, DP ;
Ferrier, S ;
Lombard, AT ;
Driver, A ;
Rouget, M ;
Maze, K ;
Desmet, PG .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (06) :1674-1676