Environmental justice and the SDGs: from synergies to gaps and contradictions

被引:208
作者
Menton, Mary [1 ]
Larrea, Carlos [2 ]
Latorre, Sara [3 ]
Martinez-Alier, Joan [4 ]
Peck, Mika [1 ]
Temper, Leah [5 ]
Walter, Mariana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sussex Sustainabil Res Programme, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Simon Bolivar Andean Univ, Quito, Ecuador
[3] Latin Amer Fac Social Sci, Quito, Ecuador
[4] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[5] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Injustice; Just sustainability; Environmental justice; Social justice; Intersectionality; Decoloniality; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS; ENERGY JUSTICE; CLIMATE JUSTICE; HUMAN-RIGHTS; PARIS AGREEMENT; NATIONAL-PARK; CONSERVATION; LIVELIHOODS; COLONIALITY; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-020-00789-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Through their synergies, trade-offs, and contradictions, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) have the potential to lead to environmental justices and injustices. Yet, environmental justice (EJ), and social justice more broadly, are not currently embedded within the language and spirit of the SDGs. We part from the premise that "many 'environmental' problems are, by their very nature, problems of justice" (Lele, Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 4:e1224, 2017). We review progress in EJ frameworks in recent years, arguing for the need to move beyond a focus on the four principles of mainstream EJ (distribution, procedure, recognition, and capabilities) towards a more intersectional decolonial approach to environmental justice that recognises the indispensability of both humans and non-humans. EJ frameworks, and the SDGs should recognise power dynamics, complex interactions among injustices, and listens to the different 'senses of justice' and desires of theorists, activists, and other stakeholder from the Global South. We analyze how EJ frameworks are, or fail to be, incorporated in the SDGs with a focus on the food-water-health nexus (SDG2, 3, 6); climate-energy (SDG7, 13), conservation (SDG14, 15); and poverty and inequality (SDG1, 10). We call attention to the 'elephant in the room'-the failure to go beyond GDP but instead include economic growth as a goal (SDG8). We argue that sustainable degrowth and intersectional decolonial environmental justices would create better conditions for the transformative changes needed to reach the broader aim of the SDGs: to leave no one behind.
引用
收藏
页码:1621 / 1636
页数:16
相关论文
共 127 条
[21]  
Bullard R. D., 1993, CONFRONTING ENV RACI
[22]   Towards Convivial Conservation [J].
Buscher, Bram ;
Fletcher, Robert .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2019, 17 (03) :283-296
[23]   Green violence: Rhino poaching and the war to save Southern Africa's peace parks [J].
Buscher, Bram ;
Ramutsindela, Maano .
AFRICAN AFFAIRS, 2016, 115 (458) :1-22
[24]   The supply chain of violence [J].
Butt, Nathalie ;
Lambrick, Frances ;
Menton, Mary ;
Renwick, Anna .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (08) :742-747
[25]   Roots of inequity: How the implementation of REDD plus reinforces past injustices [J].
Chomba, Susan ;
Kariuki, Juliet ;
Lund, Jens Friis ;
Sinclair, Fergus .
LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 50 :202-213
[26]  
Colchester M., 2003, Nomadic Peoples, V7, P33, DOI 10.3167/082279403782088840
[27]  
Cole LukeW. Sheila R. Foster., 2001, GROUND ENV RACISM RI
[28]  
Common M, 2005, ECOLOGICAL EC INTRO
[29]  
CRENSHAW K, 1993, STANFORD LAW REVIEW VOL 43, NO 6, JULY 1991, P1241
[30]  
Crenshaw Kimberle, 1989, UNIV CHICAGO LEG FOR, P139, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429500480-5