Reliable detection of fluence anomalies in EPID-based IMRT pretreatment quality assurance using pixel intensity deviations

被引:9
作者
Gordon, J. J. [1 ]
Gardner, J. K. [2 ]
Wang, S. [3 ]
Siebers, J. V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10095 USA
关键词
intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT); quality assurance (QA); electronic portal imaging device (EPID); fluence anomaly; delivery error; DOSIMETRY; QA; VERIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1118/1.4736821
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This work uses repeat images of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields to quantify fluence anomalies (i.e., delivery errors) that can be reliably detected in electronic portal images used for IMRT pretreatment quality assurance. Methods: Repeat images of 11 clinical IMRT fields are acquired on a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator at energies of 6 MV and 18 MV. Acquired images are corrected for output variations and registered to minimize the impact of linear accelerator and electronic portal imaging device (EPID) positioning deviations. Detection studies are performed in which rectangular anomalies of various sizes are inserted into the images. The performance of detection strategies based on pixel intensity deviations (PIDs) and gamma indices is evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Residual differences between registered images are due to interfraction positional deviations of jaws and multileaf collimator leaves, plus imager noise. Positional deviations produce large intensity differences that degrade anomaly detection. Gradient effects are suppressed in PIDs using gradient scaling. Background noise is suppressed using median filtering. In the majority of images, PID-based detection strategies can reliably detect fluence anomalies of >= 5% in similar to 1 mm(2) areas and >= 2% in similar to 20 mm(2) areas. Conclusions: The ability to detect small dose differences (<= 2%) depends strongly on the level of background noise. This in turn depends on the accuracy of image registration, the quality of the reference image, and field properties. The longer term aim of this work is to develop accurate and reliable methods of detecting IMRT delivery errors and variations. The ability to resolve small anomalies will allow the accuracy of advanced treatment techniques, such as image guided, adaptive, and arc therapies, to be quantified. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4736821]
引用
收藏
页码:4959 / 4975
页数:17
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[2]  
Gordon J. J., DETECTION FLUE UNPUB
[3]   Correction of pixel sensitivity variation and off-axis response for amorphous silicon EPID dosimetry [J].
Greer, PB .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) :3558-3568
[4]   Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms [J].
Guizar-Sicairos, Manuel ;
Thurman, Samuel T. ;
Fienup, James R. .
OPTICS LETTERS, 2008, 33 (02) :156-158
[5]  
Harry M.J., 2010, Practitioner's guide to statistics and lean six sigma for process improvements
[6]   Clinical use of electronic portal imaging [J].
Herman, MG .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2005, 15 (03) :157-167
[7]   Geometric interpretation of the γ dose distribution comparison technique:: Interpolation-free calculation [J].
Ju, Tao ;
Simpson, Tim ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Low, Daniel A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (03) :879-887
[8]   Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method [J].
Low, DA ;
Dempsey, JF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) :2455-2464
[9]   A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions [J].
Low, DA ;
Harms, WB ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :656-661
[10]   X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays [J].
Munro, P ;
Bouius, DC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :689-702