A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment

被引:316
作者
Villa, Ferdinando [1 ]
Bagstad, Kenneth J. [2 ]
Voigt, Brian [3 ]
Johnson, Gary W. [4 ]
Portela, Rosimeiry [5 ]
Honzak, Miroslav [5 ]
Batker, David [6 ]
机构
[1] Basque Fdn Sci, IKERBASQUE, Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
[2] US Geol Survey, Geosci & Environm Change Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Ecol Econ, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Comp Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[5] Conservat Int, Arlington, VA USA
[6] Earth Econ, Tacoma, WA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ATTRIBUTION NETWORKS SPANS; ECONOMIC VALUATION; BENEFIT TRANSFER; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; DESIGN; CLASSIFICATION; CONSERVATION; TRANSPARENT; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0091001
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecosystem Services (ES) are an established conceptual framework for attributing value to the benefits that nature provides to humans. As the promise of robust ES-driven management is put to the test, shortcomings in our ability to accurately measure, map, and value ES have surfaced. On the research side, mainstream methods for ES assessment still fall short of addressing the complex, multi-scale biophysical and socioeconomic dynamics inherent in ES provision, flow, and use. On the practitioner side, application of methods remains onerous due to data and model parameterization requirements. Further, it is increasingly clear that the dominant "one model fits all" paradigm is often ill-suited to address the diversity of real-world management situations that exist across the broad spectrum of coupled human-natural systems. This article introduces an integrated ES modeling methodology, named ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services), which aims to introduce improvements on these fronts. To improve conceptual detail and representation of ES dynamics, it adopts a uniform conceptualization of ES that gives equal emphasis to their production, flow and use by society, while keeping model complexity low enough to enable rapid and inexpensive assessment in many contexts and for multiple services. To improve fit to diverse application contexts, the methodology is assisted by model integration technologies that allow assembly of customized models from a growing model base. By using computer learning and reasoning, model structure may be specialized for each application context without requiring costly expertise. In this article we discuss the founding principles of ARIES - both its innovative aspects for ES science and as an example of a new strategy to support more accurate decision making in diverse application contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING GE
[2]   An overview of model integration for environmental application - components, frameworks and semantics [J].
Argent, RM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (03) :219-234
[3]  
ARIES Consortium, 2012, ART INT EC SERV ARIE
[4]  
Bagstad K, 2012, ECOSYSTEM SERVICE VA
[5]   A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Waage, Sissel ;
Winthrop, Robert .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 :E27-E39
[6]   Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Johnson, Gary W. ;
Voigt, Brian ;
Villa, Ferdinando .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 :117-125
[7]  
Bagstad Kenneth J., 2011, ARIES Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A guide to models and data
[8]  
Bagstad KJ, ECOLOGY SOC
[9]  
Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), 2013, INT SRING U EC SERV
[10]   Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments [J].
Bateman, Ian J. ;
Mace, Georgina M. ;
Fezzi, Carlo ;
Atkinson, Giles ;
Turner, Kerry .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (02) :177-218