Sustaining the benefits of rural water supply investments: Experience from Cochabamba and Chuquisaca, Bolivia

被引:26
作者
Davis, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Lukacs, Heather [3 ]
Jeuland, Marc [4 ]
Alvestegui, Alfonso
Soto, Betty [5 ]
Lizarraga, Gloria [5 ]
Bakalian, Alex [6 ]
Wakeman, Wendy [6 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Woods Inst Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Interdisciplinary Program Environm & Resources, Sch Earth Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] IMPACTO, La Paz, Bolivia
[6] World Bank, Private Sector Dev & Infrastructure Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007WR006550
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many rural water supply interventions in developing countries have been marked by a poor record of sustainability. Considerable progress has been made over the past several decades on the development of lower-cost technologies that are easier for communities in developing countries to maintain and also on improving project design and implementation to enhance sustainability of outcomes. Less attention has been given to the necessary and sufficient supports for water system maintenance in the postconstruction period. This study explores the contribution of various types of postconstruction support (PCS) to the sustainability of rural water supply systems in Bolivia. Using regression and matched pair statistical analyses, the effects of PCS on water system performance and user satisfaction with service are modeled. Communities that received management-oriented PCS visits from external agencies, and those whose system operators attended training workshops, had better performing systems than communities that received no such support. Engineering-oriented PCS visits to communities had no measurable impact on system functioning or user satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Finite-sample properties of propensity-score matching and weighting estimators [J].
Frölich, M .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (01) :77-90
[2]   Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: Accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Smith, J ;
Clements, N .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) :487-535
[3]  
LOCKWOOD H, 2003, POSTPROJECT IN PRESS
[4]  
PROKOPY L, 2006, EVALUATION IN PRESS
[5]   THE CENTRAL ROLE OF THE PROPENSITY SCORE IN OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES FOR CAUSAL EFFECTS [J].
ROSENBAUM, PR ;
RUBIN, DB .
BIOMETRIKA, 1983, 70 (01) :41-55
[6]  
Sara J., 1997, MAKING RURAL WATER S
[7]  
Sara J., 1996, RURAL WATER SUPPLY S
[8]  
Schouten T, 2003, Community water, community management
[9]  
Therkildsen Ole., 1988, Watering white elephants? Lessons from donor-funded planning and implementation of rural water supplies in Tanzania
[10]   Implementing a demand-driven approach to community water supply planning: A case study of Lugazi, Uganda [J].
Whittington, D ;
Davis, J ;
McClelland, E .
WATER INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 23 (03) :134-145