The impact of regulatory and financial discrimination on China's low-carbon development: Considering firm heterogeneity

被引:12
作者
Tang Wei-Qi [1 ,2 ]
Meng Bo [3 ,4 ]
Wu Li-Bo [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CIB Res, Shanghai 200120, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Ctr Energy Econ & Strategy Studies, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Inst Developing Econ JETRO, Chiba 2618545, Japan
[4] Tokyo Fdn Policy Res, Tokyo 1066234, Japan
[5] Fudan Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME); Green finance; Firm heterogeneity; ETS; CO2; emissions; Low-carbon; Chinese economy; TECHNICAL CHANGE; CO2; ABATEMENT; ENERGY; POLICY; TRANSITION; EMISSIONS; LEAKAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.accre.2020.06.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Firms in China within the same industry but with different ownership and size have different production functions and face different emission regulations and financial conditions, thus can give very different responses to environmental policies. This fact has been largely ignored in most of the low-carbon development related literature. Using an augmented Chinese input-output table in which information about firm size (large-and small and medium-sized firms) and ownership (state-, foreign-, and private-owned firms) are explicitly reported, a dynamic computable general equilibrium model is developed in this study to analyze the impact of alternative low-carbon policy designs with different regulatory coverage and financial equalization on heterogeneous firms. Our simulation results show that, with the fully balanced regulation coverage and equalized financial system for heterogeneous firms, the total green investment accounts for 4% of GDP in 2030 for fulfilling China's commitment to reduce carbon emissions, which is the lowest among the various scenarios; about one-third of this investment is made by small and private firms; at the same time, green investment efficiency will be the highest, about 84% higher than that of the business-as-usual level. Therefore, a market-oriented and new technology-driven arrangement and mechanism for sharing emission reduction burden and allocating green investment across heterogeneous firms, especially to small and medium-sized firms, is crucial for China to achieve a more ambitious emission target in the long run.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 84
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Wetlands
  • [2] Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage
    Babiker, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 65 (02) : 421 - 445
  • [3] Carbon leakage from unilateral Environmental Tax Reforms in Europe, 1995-2005
    Barker, Terry
    Junankar, Sudhir
    Pollitt, Hector
    Summerton, Philip
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (12) : 6281 - 6292
  • [4] BC (Bank of China), 2019, CHIN GREEN FIN DEV R
  • [5] British Petroleum (BP), 2016, BP STAT REV 2016 CHI
  • [6] Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto
    Buonanno, P
    Carraro, C
    Galeotti, M
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (01) : 11 - 34
  • [7] Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy
    Campiglio, Emanuele
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 121 : 220 - 230
  • [8] CBRC, 2014, CBRC VIC CHAIRM YAN
  • [9] CCCPC (Central Committee of the Communist Party of China), 2016, OUTL 13 5 YEAR 2016
  • [10] Does a regional greenhouse gas policy make sense? A case study of carbon leakage and emissions spillover
    Chen, Yihsu
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (05) : 667 - 675