How SMEs Mitigate Risks When Embarking in Open Innovation Projects

被引:0
|
作者
Tantau, Adrian Dumitru [1 ]
Paicu , Eliza Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Econ Studies, Bucharest, Romania
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, VOL 2 | 2013年
关键词
open innovation; SME; risks; innovation performance; collaboration; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; FIRMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
SMEs are the engine of economies but slightly overlooked in the open innovation literature, which provides a scarcity of studies on the risks residing in open innovation projects involving SMEs and even fewer attempts to assess the mitigation potential of these dangers Moreover, there is a limited amount of research on the innovation practices of SMEs located in Eastern European countries. In Romania, we were not able to identify one single study reflecting the extent of open innovation projects in SMEs and the risks they face, which led us to attempt to cover this gap. What allures SMEs to embrace open innovation is their resource deficiency, insufficient abilities to explore and exploit technology, major knowledge gaps and the objective of minimizing the risks of innovation. The limited literature written on SMEs and open innovation highlights the motives, the benefits and the barriers these engines of economy confront when embarking in open innovation projects. However, no particular attempt to further the research into managing and mitigating the effective risks triggered by open innovation in SMEs was found. Based on a survey conducted on 211 Romanian SMEs in the Romanian financial services and consultancy sector, this paper both explores the risks affecting the innovation performance of SMEs in collaborative relationships, and seeks to provide a conceptual model for overcoming these threats. Within the survey, our work highlights that open innovation in Romanian SMEs is impeded by risks related to insufficient financial resources, inexperienced, unmotivated and unwilling to cooperate people, poor adaptation to technological advances in the industry, knowledge sharing risks, weak social capital and noteworthy regulation risks. All the risks identified through our research were mapped down in seven categories of risk drivers, with internal and external origin: workforce, collaboration itself, organizational culture / social capital, regulations and market barriers, clients, access to finance, technology advances. The risk mitigation model is centred on the SMEs key strategic advantages: high flexibility, ability for adaptation, people empowerment. The research results support the potential of mitigating risks SMEs face in open innovation projects, and indicate six factors as main risk mitigators: transparent communication among innovators, trust building, people empowerment, organizational learning and investment in knowledge, leadership, vision and convictions, proactiveness towards unethical behaviour. The results of our study can guide an SME to competitive advantage, parting both from the essence of collaboration in the scope of innovation, as well as from the challenge of efficiently managing the risks the process involves. Our model is appropriate to benchmark a financial sector SME. By undertaking this study we aim to contribute to the scarce literature on open innovation practices in Romanian SMEs and to shed light on the factors that a firm needs to approach in order to foster a culture for innovation and, in the same time, reduce the open innovation risks.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 596
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Open innovation and superior performance in SMEs: The mediating role of marketing capabilities and innovation
    Cruz Rincon, Martha Lucia
    Alegre Vidal, Joaquin
    Villar Garcia, Cristina
    Agredo Diaz, Martha Lucia
    Fajardo Ortiz, Mercedes
    Puente Castro, Raquel
    DIRECCION Y ORGANIZACION, 2022, 77 : 5 - 21
  • [42] Capacity of open innovation activities in fostering product and process innovation in manufacturing SMEs
    Madrid-Guijarro, Antonia
    Martin, Dominique Philippe
    Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, Domingo
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 15 (07) : 2137 - 2164
  • [43] The cities of the future: Hybrid alliances for open innovation Check tor projects
    Ferraris, Alberto
    Santoro, Gabriele
    Papa, Armando
    FUTURES, 2018, 103 : 51 - 60
  • [44] When do trademarks improve the measurement of innovation? An analysis of innovations from Dutch SMEs
    Morales, Pablo
    Flikkema, Meindert
    Castaldi, Carolina
    de Man, Ard-Pieter
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 51 (05) : 923 - 938
  • [45] Engaging with open innovation: A scottish perspective on its opportunities, challenges and risks
    Dekkers, Rob
    Koukou, Maria Ioanna
    Mitchell, Susie
    Sinclair, Scott
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT, 2019, (28): : 193 - 226
  • [46] PARTNERS AND GEOGRAPHICAL SCALE OF SMES' OPEN INNOVATION: DOES BUSINESS GROUP AFFILIATION MATTER?
    Deltour, Francois
    Le Gall, Sebastien
    Lethiais, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25 (06)
  • [47] THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON OPEN INNOVATION: THE TUNISIAN SMEs CASE
    Ouechtati, Sana
    Masmoudi, Kaouther Korbi
    Slim, Chokri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01)
  • [48] Knowledge Management, Knowledge Creation, and Open Innovation in Icelandic SMEs
    Grimsdottir, Elsa
    Edvardsson, Ingi Runar
    SAGE OPEN, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [49] Overcoming Failure: Abandonments and Delays of Innovation Projects in SMEs
    Radas, Sonja
    Bozic, Ljiljana
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2012, 19 (08) : 649 - 669
  • [50] Organizational and Institutional Proximity Effect on SMEs Open Innovation Activities
    Gyamfi, Solomon
    Stejskal, Jan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2021), 2021, : 317 - 326