How SMEs Mitigate Risks When Embarking in Open Innovation Projects

被引:0
|
作者
Tantau, Adrian Dumitru [1 ]
Paicu , Eliza Laura [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Econ Studies, Bucharest, Romania
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, VOL 2 | 2013年
关键词
open innovation; SME; risks; innovation performance; collaboration; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; FIRMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
SMEs are the engine of economies but slightly overlooked in the open innovation literature, which provides a scarcity of studies on the risks residing in open innovation projects involving SMEs and even fewer attempts to assess the mitigation potential of these dangers Moreover, there is a limited amount of research on the innovation practices of SMEs located in Eastern European countries. In Romania, we were not able to identify one single study reflecting the extent of open innovation projects in SMEs and the risks they face, which led us to attempt to cover this gap. What allures SMEs to embrace open innovation is their resource deficiency, insufficient abilities to explore and exploit technology, major knowledge gaps and the objective of minimizing the risks of innovation. The limited literature written on SMEs and open innovation highlights the motives, the benefits and the barriers these engines of economy confront when embarking in open innovation projects. However, no particular attempt to further the research into managing and mitigating the effective risks triggered by open innovation in SMEs was found. Based on a survey conducted on 211 Romanian SMEs in the Romanian financial services and consultancy sector, this paper both explores the risks affecting the innovation performance of SMEs in collaborative relationships, and seeks to provide a conceptual model for overcoming these threats. Within the survey, our work highlights that open innovation in Romanian SMEs is impeded by risks related to insufficient financial resources, inexperienced, unmotivated and unwilling to cooperate people, poor adaptation to technological advances in the industry, knowledge sharing risks, weak social capital and noteworthy regulation risks. All the risks identified through our research were mapped down in seven categories of risk drivers, with internal and external origin: workforce, collaboration itself, organizational culture / social capital, regulations and market barriers, clients, access to finance, technology advances. The risk mitigation model is centred on the SMEs key strategic advantages: high flexibility, ability for adaptation, people empowerment. The research results support the potential of mitigating risks SMEs face in open innovation projects, and indicate six factors as main risk mitigators: transparent communication among innovators, trust building, people empowerment, organizational learning and investment in knowledge, leadership, vision and convictions, proactiveness towards unethical behaviour. The results of our study can guide an SME to competitive advantage, parting both from the essence of collaboration in the scope of innovation, as well as from the challenge of efficiently managing the risks the process involves. Our model is appropriate to benchmark a financial sector SME. By undertaking this study we aim to contribute to the scarce literature on open innovation practices in Romanian SMEs and to shed light on the factors that a firm needs to approach in order to foster a culture for innovation and, in the same time, reduce the open innovation risks.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 596
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AN OVERVIEW OF BENEFITS AND RISKS IN OPEN INNOVATION PROJECTS AND THE INFLUENCE OF INTERMEDIARY PARTICIPATION, DECISION-MAKING AUTHORITY, EXPERIENCE, AND POSITION ON THEIR PERCEPTION
    Ullrich, Andre
    Vladova, Gergana
    Marquart, Danny
    Braun, Andreas
    Gronau, Norbert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (02)
  • [32] Remote Innovation: How Remote Work Enables Open Innovation in Times of COVID-19
    Konrad-Maerk, Marina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 20 (03)
  • [33] Technology portfolio perspective for analyzing open innovation: insights from Iranian high-tech SMEs
    Mashayekh, Javad
    Zakery, Amir
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 2024, 32 (03) : 506 - 528
  • [34] Open innovation in SMEs: A process view towards business model innovation
    Albats, Ekaterina
    Podmetina, Daria
    Vanhaverbeke, Wim
    JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 61 (06) : 2519 - 2560
  • [35] SMEs embedded in collaborative innovation networks: How to measure their absorptive capacity?
    Benhayoun, Lamiae
    Le Dain, Marie-Anne
    Dominguez-Pery, Carine
    Lyons, Andrew C.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 159
  • [36] Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges
    van de Vrande, Vareska
    de Jong, Jeroen P. J.
    Vanhaverbeke, Wim
    de Rochemont, Maurice
    TECHNOVATION, 2009, 29 (6-7) : 423 - 437
  • [37] Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research
    Carrasco-Carvajal, Omar
    Castillo-Vergara, Mauricio
    Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, Domingo
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 17 (02) : 397 - 442
  • [38] Managing open innovation projects: an evidence-based framework for SMEs and large companies cooperation
    Giardino, Pier Luigi
    Cristofaro, Matteo
    Marullo, Cristina
    MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2022, : 1163 - 1183
  • [39] Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs
    Freel, Mark
    Robson, Paul J.
    INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2017, 35 (05): : 578 - 596
  • [40] Innovation Hubs; a new form for Open Innovation in SMEs
    van der Meer, Han
    de Groot, Hilde
    IFKAD 2017: 12TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY: RESILIENCE, CREATIVITY AND CO-CREATION, 2017, : 661 - 674