Metrics for Metadata Quality Assurance and Their Implications for Digital Libraries

被引:0
作者
Chen, Ya-Ning [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Chun-Ya [3 ]
Chen, Hui-Pin [2 ]
Lin, Yen-Hung [4 ]
Sum, Hon-Chung [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Grad Inst Lib & Informat Studies, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Acad Sinica, Comp Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Acad Sinica, Res Ctr Informat Technol Innovat, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Acad Sinica, Inst History & Philol, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
DIGITAL LIBRARIES: FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE, KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION, AND FUTURE CREATION: ICADL 2011 | 2011年 / 7008卷
关键词
metadata; quality assurance; evaluation; digital libraries; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study aims at developing a set of common metrics for metadata quality at data element level. The proposed metrics are used to assure the quality for metadata that converted from heterogeneous metadata formats and sources into a Dublin Core based centralized digital repository. This study adopted the metrics provided by Bruce and Hillmann [2] as a basis to develop the proposed metrics as follows: conformance to expectations, provenance, accuracy, completeness and accessibility. A hybrid approach of automatic and manual had developed for assessing metadata quality in practice. Target subjects were two individual projects selected from the Taiwan E-Learning and Digital Archives Program as use case to illustrate the details and examine the feasibility of the proposed metrics. Finally, this study discussed the implications of proposed metadata quality metrics for digital libraries in the following perspectives: project management, metadata management, hidden quality problems and accessibility.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Barton J., 2003, P 2003 DUBL COR C SU, P39
[2]  
Bruce T., 2004, METADATA PRACTICE, P248
[3]  
Currier S., 2004, Research in Learning Technology, V12, P5, DOI [10.1080/0968776042000211494, DOI 10.1080/0968776042000211494]
[4]  
Guy M., 2004, Ariadne, V38
[5]  
Hughes B, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3334, P320
[6]  
Kelly B, 2005, LIBR TRENDS, V53, P637
[7]  
Ma S., 2009, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, V46, P1
[8]  
Moen W.E., 1998, P P ADL 1998 P ADV D
[9]  
Moen WE., 1997, The role of content analysis in evaluating metadata for the U.S. Government Information Locator Service (GILS): results from an exploratory study
[10]  
Ochoa X., 2009, AUTOMATIC EVALUATION