Semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative low grade gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging

被引:25
作者
Akkus, Zeynettin [1 ]
Sedlar, Jiri [1 ]
Coufalova, Lucie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Korfiatis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Kline, Timothy L. [1 ]
Warner, Joshua D. [1 ]
Agrawal, Jay [1 ]
Erickson, Bradley J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] St Annes Univ Hosp Brno, Int Clin Res Ctr, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Neurosurg, Mil Univ Hosp, Prague, Czech Republic
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BRAIN-TUMOR SEGMENTATION; AUTOMATIC BRAIN; ALGORITHM; EVOLUTION; ATLAS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-015-0047-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Segmentation of pre-operative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from magnetic resonance imaging is a crucial step for studying imaging biomarkers. However, segmentation of LGGs is particularly challenging because they rarely enhance after gadolinium administration. Like other gliomas, they have irregular tumor shape, heterogeneous composition, ill-defined tumor boundaries, and limited number of image types. To overcome these challenges we propose a semi-automated segmentation method that relies only on T2-weighted (T2W) and optionally post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images. Methods: First, the user draws a region-of-interest (ROI) that completely encloses the tumor and some normal tissue. Second, a normal brain atlas and post-contrast T1W images are registered to T2W images. Third, the posterior probability of each pixel/voxel belonging to normal and abnormal tissues is calculated based on information derived from the atlas and ROI. Finally, geodesic active contours use the probability map of the tumor to shrink the ROI until optimal tumor boundaries are found. This method was validated against the true segmentation (TS) of 30 LGG patients for both 2D (1 slice) and 3D. The TS was obtained from manual segmentations of three experts using the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) software. Dice and Jaccard indices and other descriptive statistics were computed for the proposed method, as well as the experts' segmentation versus the TS. We also tested the method with the BraTS datasets, which supply expert segmentations. Results and discussion: For 2D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.90 +/- 0.06 (standard deviation), sensitivity was 0.92, and specificity was 0.99. For 3D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.89 +/- 0.06, sensitivity was 0.91, and specificity was 0.99. The automated results are comparable with the experts' manual segmentation results. Conclusions: We present an accurate, robust, efficient, and reproducible segmentation method for pre-operative LGGs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] The Insight ToolKit image registration framework
    Avants, Brian B.
    Tustison, Nicholas J.
    Stauffer, Michael
    Song, Gang
    Wu, Baohua
    Gee, James C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2014, 8
  • [2] A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
    Bauer, Stefan
    Wiest, Roland
    Nolte, Lutz-P
    Reyes, Mauricio
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (13) : R97 - R129
  • [3] Bauer S, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6893, P354, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_44
  • [4] Cha S, 2006, AM J NEURORADIOL, V27, P475
  • [5] Efficient multilevel brain tumor segmentation with integrated Bayesian model classification
    Corso, Jason J.
    Sharon, Eitan
    Dube, Shishir
    El-Saden, Suzie
    Sinha, Usha
    Yuille, Alan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2008, 27 (05) : 629 - 640
  • [6] Medical progress: Brain tumors
    DeAngelis, LM
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (02) : 114 - 123
  • [7] MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM
    DEMPSTER, AP
    LAIRD, NM
    RUBIN, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01): : 1 - 38
  • [8] Hamamci A, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6363, P137
  • [9] Fully automated tumor segmentation based on improved fuzzy connectedness algorithm in brain MR images
    Harati, Vida
    Khayati, Rasoul
    Farzan, Abdolreza
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (07) : 483 - 492
  • [10] Ho S, 2002, INT C PATT RECOG, P532, DOI 10.1109/ICPR.2002.1044788