Measurement Properties of Questionnaires Measuring Continuity of Care: A Systematic Review

被引:67
|
作者
Uijen, Annemarie A. [1 ]
Heinst, Claire W. [1 ]
Schellevis, Francois G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
van den Bosch, Wil J. H. M. [1 ]
van de Laar, Floris A. [1 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [4 ,5 ]
Schers, Henk J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Primary & Community Care, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 07期
关键词
UPDATED METHOD GUIDELINES; SELF-REPORT MEASURE; CARDIAC PATIENTS; HEALTH OUTCOMES; CANCER CARE; VALIDATION; COORDINATION; PERCEPTIONS; QUALITY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0042256
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Continuity of care is widely acknowledged as a core value in family medicine. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the instruments measuring continuity of care and to assess the quality of their measurement properties. Methods: We did a systematic review using the PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, with an extensive search strategy including 'continuity of care', 'coordination of care', 'integration of care', 'patient centered care', 'case management' and its linguistic variations. We searched from 1995 to October 2011 and included articles describing the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of instruments measuring one or more dimensions of continuity of care (1) care from the same provider who knows and follows the patient (personal continuity), (2) communication and cooperation between care providers in one care setting (team continuity), and (3) communication and cooperation between care providers in different care settings (cross-boundary continuity). We assessed the methodological quality of the measurement properties of each instrument using the COSMIN checklist. Results: We included 24 articles describing the development and/or evaluation of 21 instruments. Ten instruments measured all three dimensions of continuity of care. Instruments were developed for different groups of patients or providers. For most instruments, three or four of the six measurement properties were assessed (mostly internal consistency, content validity, structural validity and construct validity). Six instruments scored positive on the quality of at least three of six measurement properties. Conclusions: Most included instruments have problems with either the number or quality of its assessed measurement properties or the ability to measure all three dimensions of continuity of care. Based on the results of this review, we recommend the use of one of the four most promising instruments, depending on the target population Diabetes Continuity of Care Questionnaire, Alberta Continuity of Services Scale-Mental Health, Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire, and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometric Properties of Questionnaires on Functional Health Status in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Literature Review
    Speyer, Renee
    Cordier, Reinie
    Kertscher, Berit
    Heijnen, Bas J.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [22] Systematic review of dating violence questionnaires in Ibero-America and evaluation of their measurement properties
    Yanelli Yanez-Penunuri, Libia
    Alejandro Hidalgo-Rasmussen, Carlos
    Viridiana Chavez-Flores, Yolanda
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (06): : 2249 - 2262
  • [23] Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review
    Schellingerhout, Jasper M.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    Koes, Bart W.
    de Vet, Henrica C.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (04) : 659 - 670
  • [24] Questionnaires assessing the use of complementary health approaches in pediatrics and their measurement properties: A systematic review
    Alqudimat, Mohammad R.
    April, Karine Toupin
    Hundert, Amos
    Jibb, Lindsay
    Victor, Charles
    Nathan, Paul C.
    Stinson, Jennifer
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 53
  • [25] Neuropathic pain screening questionnaires have limited measurement properties. A systematic review
    Mathieson, Stephanie
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    de Campos, Tarcisio Folly
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (08) : 957 - 966
  • [26] METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF STUDIES ON THE MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES OF NECK PAIN AND DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Schellingerhout, Jasper M.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Koes, Bart W.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 34 (04) : 261 - 272
  • [27] Measuring situation awareness in health care providers: a systematic review of measurement properties using COSMIN methodology
    Chiman Ghaderi
    Roghayeh Esmaeili
    Abbas Ebadi
    Mohammad Reza Amiri
    Systematic Reviews, 12
  • [28] Measuring situation awareness in health care providers: a systematic review of measurement properties using COSMIN methodology
    Ghaderi, Chiman
    Esmaeili, Roghayeh
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Amiri, Mohammad Reza
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [29] Instruments for Measuring the Burden of Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Zhou, Yue
    Zhang, Jie
    Pan, Yufan
    Dai, Yu
    Sun, Yujian
    Xiao, Yi
    Tang, Fuyou
    Yu, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [30] Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review
    Baker, Richard
    Freeman, George K.
    Haggerty, Jeannie L.
    Bankart, M. John
    Nockels, Keith H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2020, 70 (698) : E600 - E611