On improving normal boundary intersection method for generation of Pareto frontier

被引:22
作者
Siddiqui, S. [1 ]
Azarm, S. [2 ]
Gabriel, S. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] ICF Int, Fairfax, VA 22031 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Mech Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI); Multi-objective optimization; Continuous nonlinear optimization; Pareto solutions; Quasi-Newton methods; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; NORMAL CONSTRAINT METHOD; DESIGN; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-012-0797-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Gradient-based methods, including Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI), for solving multi-objective optimization problems require solving at least one optimization problem for each solution point. These methods can be computationally expensive with an increase in the number of variables and/or constraints of the optimization problem. This paper provides a modification to the original NBI algorithm so that continuous Pareto frontiers are obtained "in one go," i.e., by solving only a single optimization problem. Discontinuous Pareto frontiers require solving a significantly fewer number of optimization problems than the original NBI algorithm. In the proposed method, the optimization problem is solved using a quasi-Newton method whose history of iterates is used to obtain points on the Pareto frontier. The proposed and the original NBI methods have been applied to a collection of 16 test problems, including a welded beam design and a heat exchanger design problem. The results show that the proposed approach significantly reduces the number of function calls when compared to the original NBI algorithm.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 852
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bazaraa M. S., 2006, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[2]  
Cohon J., 2004, Multiobjective Programming and Planning
[3]  
Collette Y., 2004, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-08883-8
[4]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[5]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69
[6]  
Das I, 1999, STRUCT OPTIMIZATION, V18, P107, DOI 10.1007/s001580050111
[7]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[8]   Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization [J].
Goel, Tushar ;
Vaidyanathan, Rajkumar ;
Haftka, Raphael T. ;
Shyy, Wei ;
Queipo, Nestor V. ;
Tucker, Kevin .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 196 (4-6) :879-893
[9]   Non-gradient based parameter sensitivity estimation for single objective robust design optimization [J].
Gunawan, S ;
Azarm, S .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2004, 126 (03) :395-402
[10]   Blessings of Maintaining Infeasible Solutions for Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Problems [J].
Isaacs, Amitay ;
Ray, Tapabrata ;
Smith, Warren .
2008 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-8, 2008, :2780-2787