Supporting Innovation with the use of a Balanced Scorecard Approach to Manage Knowledge Transfer

被引:0
作者
Polkinghorne, Martyn [1 ]
Manville, Graham [1 ]
Petford, Nick [2 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
来源
3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION | 2008年
关键词
Knowledge management; knowledge transfer partnerships; balanced scorecard; deep smarts; intellectual capital audit; consequential beneficial attributes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper considers supporting innovation through improvements to the management of knowledge within a UK Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP), and reflects upon the need to ensure that the knowledge being transferred is based upon Deep Smarts. Deep Smarts are very difficult to define, and it was therefore considered that by monitoring changes within any consequential beneficial attributes associated with the Deep Smarts, through an Intellectual Capital Audit (ICA), a direct indication of successful knowledge transfer could be achieved. As a further indication of the level of Deep Smarts exploitation occurring on an on-going basis, when the cause (Deep Smarts) can't be measured, measuring the symptoms (any apparent consequential beneficial attributes) can provide a useful indicator of progress. So that the potential for innovation and creativity could be maximised, a generic balanced scorecard for Deep Smarts applied to KTPs was developed to be used as a tool to both determine the level of consequential beneficial attributes relating to the successful knowledge transfer, and also to assess the deployment of Deep Smarts within the delivery of a Knowledge Transfer Partnership.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 229
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Andriessen D., 2004, Journal of Intellectual capital, V5, P230, DOI DOI 10.1108/14691930410533669
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MIND MACHINE
[3]  
Atkinson H., 2006, MANAGE DECIS, V44, P1441, DOI [DOI 10.1108/00251740610715740, 10.1108/00251740610715740]
[4]   Dynamics of performance measurement systems [J].
Bititci, US ;
Turner, T ;
Begemann, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (5-6) :692-704
[5]   Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda [J].
Garengo, P ;
Biazzo, S ;
Bititci, US .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2005, 7 (01) :25-47
[6]   The changing basis of performance measurement [J].
Ghalayini, AM ;
Noble, JS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1996, 16 (08) :63-&
[7]   Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems [J].
Hudson, M ;
Smart, A ;
Bourne, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2001, 21 (08) :1096-1115
[8]  
Johnson H.T., 1987, Relevance lost The rise and fall of management accounting
[9]  
Kaplan R.S., 1996, The Balanced Scorecard- Translating Strategy into Action
[10]  
Kaplan R.S Norton., 2000, STRATEGY FOCUSED ORG, VFirst