How Large Are Actor and Partner Effects of Personality on Relationship Satisfaction? The Importance of Controlling for Shared Method Variance

被引:105
作者
Orth, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Big Five personality traits; relationship satisfaction; dyadic data analysis; actor-partner interdependence model; self- and partner reports; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; DYADIC ADJUSTMENT SCALE; BIG; 5; INTIMATE-RELATIONSHIPS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; INTERDEPENDENCE MODEL; MARITAL SATISFACTION; LIFE SATISFACTION; SELF-ENHANCEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/0146167213492429
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research suggests that the personality of a relationship partner predicts not only the individual's own satisfaction with the relationship but also the partner's satisfaction. Based on the actor-partner interdependence model, the present research tested whether actor and partner effects of personality are biased when the same method (e.g., self-report) is used for the assessment of personality and relationship satisfaction and, consequently, shared method variance is not controlled for. Data came from 186 couples, of whom both partners provided self- and partner reports on the Big Five personality traits. Depending on the research design, actor effects were larger than partner effects (when using only self-reports), smaller than partner effects (when using only partner reports), or of about the same size as partner effects (when using self- and partner reports). The findings attest to the importance of controlling for shared method variance in dyadic data analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1372
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Ackerman R.A., 2011, Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood, P67
[2]   Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling [J].
Allison, PD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (04) :545-557
[3]   Self and partner personality in intimate relationships [J].
Barelds, DPH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2005, 19 (06) :501-518
[4]   The ubiquity of common method variance: The case of the Big Five [J].
Biderman, Michael D. ;
Nguyen, Nhung T. ;
Cunningham, Christopher J. L. ;
Ghorbani, Nima .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2011, 45 (05) :417-429
[5]   Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction [J].
Botwin, MD ;
Buss, DM ;
Shackelford, TK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1997, 65 (01) :107-136
[6]   How do I analyze thee? Let me count the ways: Considering empathy in couple relationships using self and partner ratings [J].
Busby, Dean M. ;
Gardner, Brandt C. .
FAMILY PROCESS, 2008, 47 (02) :229-242
[7]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[8]   Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling [J].
Cole, DA ;
Maxwell, SE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (04) :558-577
[9]   ESTIMATING TRAIT, METHOD, AND ERROR VARIANCE - GENERALIZING ACROSS 70 CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION STUDIES [J].
COTE, JA ;
BUCKLEY, MR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1987, 24 (03) :315-318
[10]   Incremental Validity of Spouse Ratings Versus Self-Reports of Personality as Predictors of Marital Quality and Behavior During Marital Conflict [J].
Cundiff, Jenny M. ;
Smith, Timothy W. ;
Frandsen, Clay A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 24 (03) :676-684