The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Survival in the Southern Netherlands

被引:36
作者
Aarts, Mieke J.
Koldewijn, Evert L.
Poortmans, Philip M.
Coebergh, Jan Willem W.
Louwman, Marieke
机构
[1] Comprehens Canc Ctr S IKZ, Eindhoven Canc Registry, Dept Res, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Urol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Reg Study Grp Urol Oncol IKZ, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Inst Verbeeten, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMORBIDITY; RADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; INEQUALITY; DIAGNOSIS; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; TRENDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate if socioeconomic status (SES) played a role in the selection of prostate cancer treatment and overall survival. METHODS Treatment and survival by SES of all newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (1998-2008) from the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry (n = 11,086) were studied. RESULTS Younger patients (< 75) with early stage disease, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-detected stage cT1c, with low SES underwent prostatectomy and brachytherapy less often (10%-16% lower prostatectomy rates in low SES and 0%-7% lower brachytherapy rates in low SES) compared to those with high SES, but underwent more external beam radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and watchful waiting policy (6%-9%, 5%-7%, and 3%-7% more in lowSES, respectively). This was partially related to the prevalence of comorbidity. The introduction of brachytherapy for localized disease occurred first in high SES patients and these socioeconomic differences were hardly affected by socioeconomic differences in the presence of comorbidities. Overall 10-year survival was superior in high SES patients compared to low SES (localized disease 67% vs 44%, advanced disease 29% vs 20%), and was related to treatment and comorbidity. Multivariable adjusted death rates remained significantly elevated for patients with lowSES, especially cT1c, age < 60 (hazard ratio [HR](low_vs_high_SES) 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.3-13.7). CONCLUSION SES affected treatment selection and overall survival for patients with prostate cancer in the Southern Netherlands, where treatment guidelines exist and health care is fully covered. Presence of comorbidities only partly contributed to these differences. The relation with other SES-associated factors (eg, ability to understand medical information or to cope with health problems) remains to be explored. UROLOGY 81: 593-601, 2013. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Reduction of socioeconomic inequality in cancer incidence in the South of the Netherlands during 1996-2008 [J].
Aarts, M. J. ;
van der Aa, M. A. ;
Coebergh, J. W. W. ;
Louwman, W. J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (14) :2633-2646
[2]   Long-term Prostate Cancer Survivors With Low Socioeconomic Status Reported Worse Mental Health-related Quality of Life in a Population-based Study [J].
Aarts, Mieke J. ;
Mols, Floortje ;
Thong, Melissa S. Y. ;
Louwman, Marieke W. ;
Coebergh, Jan Willem W. ;
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) :1224-1230
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Maandstatistiek Van de Bevolking
[4]   Differences according to socioeconomic status in the management and mortality in men with high risk prostate cancer [J].
Berglund, Anders ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Robinson, David ;
Tishelman, Carol ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Bratt, Ola ;
Adolfsson, Jan ;
Stattin, Par ;
Lambe, Mats .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 (01) :75-84
[5]   Comorbidity, Treatment and Mortality: A Population Based Cohort Study of Prostate Cancer in PCBaSe Sweden [J].
Berglund, Anders ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Tishelman, Carol ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Stattin, Paer ;
Lambe, Mats .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) :833-839
[6]  
BOS V, 2000, VERSLAG PROGRAMMACOM, V2
[7]   The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States - Findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries patterns of care study [J].
Byers, Tim E. ;
Wolf, Holly J. ;
Bauer, Katrina R. ;
Bolick-Aldrich, Susan ;
Chen, Vivien W. ;
Finch, Jack L. ;
Fulton, John P. ;
Schymura, Maria J. ;
Shen, Tiefu ;
Van Heest, Scoff ;
Yin, Xiang .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (03) :582-591
[8]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[9]   Prostate cancer: Trends in incidence, survival and mortality in the Netherlands, 1989-2006 [J].
Cremers, R. G. H. M. ;
Karim-Kos, H. E. ;
Houterman, S. ;
Verhoeven, R. H. A. ;
Schroder, F. H. ;
van der Kwast, T. H. ;
Kil, P. J. M. ;
Coebergh, J. W. W. ;
Kiemeney, L. A. L. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (11) :2077-2087
[10]   Trends in non-metastatic prostate cancer management in the Northern and Yorkshire region of England, 2000-2006 [J].
Fairley, L. ;
Baker, M. ;
Whiteway, J. ;
Cross, W. ;
Forman, D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (11) :1839-1845