Carbon dioxide emission during the life cycle of turbofan aircraft

被引:19
作者
Jakovljevic, Ivan [1 ]
Mijailovic, Radomir [2 ]
Mirosavljevic, Petar [2 ]
机构
[1] SKY Partner RS Ltd, Aerodrom Nikola Tesla Beograd, Beograd 11080, Surcin, Serbia
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Transport & Traff Engn, Vojvode Stepe 305, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
Carbon dioxide; Life cycle; Aircraft; Degradation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HIGH-TEMPERATURE; TRADING SCHEME; AVIATION; ENGINE; AIR; DEGRADATION; PERFORMANCE; AIRLINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.022
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aircraft performance degradation causes higher fuel consumption. This results in higher emission and it is an important factor when the complete life cycle is analyzed. Current research in the field doesn't quantify degradation emissions in the life cycle of an aircraft. The objective of this paper is to suggest a methodology for determining carbon dioxide emission during the life cycle of turbofan aircraft. Special attention is given to degradation and the importance of proper and timely maintenance as a way of controlling these emissions. Degradation plays a significant role in the carbon dioxide emission of turbo fan aircraft. The life cycle was modeled by eight sequences. In this paper a new mathematical interpretation is suggested for following life sequences: use and repair. In the use cycle, emission caused by aerodynamic structure degradation and engine degradation is calculated separately. The proposed methodology was implemented on four and tested on eight turbofan aircraft. Results show that more than 99% of carbon dioxide emission occurs in the use sequence. The emission caused by degradation (aerodynamic structure and engine) makes up between 3.6% and 6.4% of total carbon dioxide emission. A novel methodology for reducing emission caused by degradation is proposed by the authors. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 875
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Airbus, 2002, Getting to Grips with Aircraft Performance
[2]  
Airbus, 2004, GETT GRIPS FUEL EC
[3]  
Aircraft Commerce, 2016, CFM56 3 MAINT AN BUD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ICAO CARBON EMISSION
[5]   Future aircraft concept in terms of energy efficiency and environmental factors [J].
Baharozu, Eren ;
Soykan, Gurkan ;
Ozerdem, Baris .
ENERGY, 2017, 140 :1368-1377
[6]   Comparative case study of life usage and data-driven prognostics techniques using aircraft fault messages [J].
Baptista, Marcia ;
de Medeiros, Ivo P. ;
Malere, Joao P. ;
Nascimento, Cairo, Jr. ;
Prendinger, Helmut ;
Henriques, Elsa M. P. .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2017, 86 :1-14
[7]   What role for offsetting aviation greenhouse gas emissions in a deep-cut carbon world? [J].
Becken, Susanne ;
Mackey, Brendan .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 63 :71-83
[8]   Life cycle evaluation of hydrogen and other potential fuels for aircrafts [J].
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (16) :10722-10738
[9]   Short/medium-term prediction for the aviation emissions in the en route airspace considering the fluctuation in air traffic demand [J].
Chen, Dan ;
Hu, Minghua ;
Han, Ke ;
Zhang, Honghai ;
Yin, Jianan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 48 :46-62
[10]   Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessment of a small-scale turbojet fuelled with biodiesel [J].
Coban, Kahraman ;
Sohret, Yasin ;
Colpan, C. Ozgur ;
Karakoc, T. Hikmet .
ENERGY, 2017, 140 :1358-1367