Clinical analysis of speculum-based vaginal packing for high-dose-rate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy in cervical cancer

被引:8
作者
Sud, Shivani [1 ]
Roth, Toni [2 ]
Jones, Ellen [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Brown Univ, Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
intracavitary brachytherapy; cervical cancer; rectal dose; bladder dose; speculum; retractor; LATE RECTAL COMPLICATIONS; VOLUME PARAMETERS; SPACER BALLOON; CARCINOMA; REDUCTION; RECOMMENDATIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; RETRACTOR; CISPLATIN; TERMS;
D O I
10.5114/jcb.2018.74316
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Intra-vaginal packing is used to fix the applicator and displace organs at risk (OAR) during high-doserate intracavitary tandem and ovoid brachytherapy (HDR-ICB). We retain the speculum from applicator placement as a dual-function bladder and rectum retractor during treatment. Our objective is to review salient techniques for OAR displacement, share our packing technique, and determine the reduction in dose to OAR and inter-fraction variability of dose to OAR, associated with speculum-based vaginal packing (SBVP) in comparison to conventional gauze packing during HDR-ICB. Material and methods: We reviewed HDR-ICB treatment plans for 45 patients, including 10 who underwent both conventional gauze packing and SBVP. Due to institutional inter-provider practice differences, patients non-selectively received either packing procedure. Packing was performed under conscious sedation, followed by cone beam computed tomography used for dosimetric planning. Maximum absolute and percent-of-prescription dose to the International Commission of Radiation Units bladder and rectal points in addition to D-0.1cc, D-1.0cc, and D-2.0cc volumes of the bladder and rectum were analyzed and compared for each packing method using an independent sample t-test. Results: Of the 179 fractions included, 73% and 27% used SBVP and gauze packing, respectively. For patients prescribed 6 Gy to point A, SBVP was associated with reduced mean D-0.1cc bladder dose, inter-fraction variability in D-0.1cc bladder dose by 9.3% (p = 0.026) and 9.0%, respectively, and statistically equivalent rectal D-0.1cc, D-1.0cc, and D-2.0cc. Patients prescribed 5.5 Gy or 5 Gy to point A after dose optimization, were less likely to benefit from SBVP. In the intra- patient comparison, 80% of patients had reduction in at least one rectum or bladder parameter. Conclusions: In patients with conducive anatomy, SBVP is a cost-efficient packing method that is associated with improved bladder sparing and comparable rectal sparing relative to gauze packing during HDR-ICB without general anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   3D CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Clinical impact on late rectal bleeding and local control [J].
Kang, Hyun-Cheol ;
Shin, Kyung Hwan ;
Park, Sung-Yong ;
Kim, Joo-Young .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (03) :507-513
[42]   Pain in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Becerra-Bolanos, Angel ;
Jimenez-Gil, Miriam ;
Federico, Mario ;
Dominguez-Diaz, Yurena ;
Valencia, Lucia ;
Rodriguez-Perez, Aurelio .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (08)
[43]   A Retrospective Analysis Comparing the Dosimetric Parameters of Two Rectum-Sparing Techniques During Intracavitary Brachytherapy with Tandem-Ring Applicators for Cervical Cancer [J].
Vats, Siddharth ;
Thakur, Shabnum ;
Gupta, Manish ;
Kumar, Vineet ;
Chandrakant, Lalit ;
Negi, Muninder ;
Sharma, Parul ;
Fotedar, Vikas ;
Thakur, Purnima ;
Tuli, Deepak ;
Vias, Poorva ;
Sharma, Jyoti ;
Negi, Anup ;
Kaushal, Shilpa ;
Upadhyay, Mrinalini ;
Negi, Naina ;
Sharma, Ajay ;
Azad, Anjali ;
Parihar, Neeraj ;
Verma, Divyajyoti .
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2025, 17 :1155-1168
[44]   Towards Enabling Ultrasound Guidance in Cervical Cancer High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy [J].
Wong, Adrian ;
Sojoudi, Samira ;
Gaudet, Marc ;
Yap, Wan Wan ;
Chang, Silvia D. ;
Abolmaesumi, Purang ;
Aquino-Parsons, Christina ;
Moradi, Mehdi .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2014, 9036
[45]   Comparison of high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy dosimetry with and without anesthesia in patients with cervical carcinoma [J].
Sharma, Daya N. ;
Chaudhari, Pritee ;
Sharma, Seema ;
Gupta, Leena ;
Jagadesan, Pandjatcharam ;
Rath, Goura K. ;
Julka, Pramod K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (02) :60-66
[46]   Combination external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: Analysis of dose and fractionation schedule [J].
Toita, T ;
Kakinohana, Y ;
Ogawa, K ;
Adachi, G ;
Moromizato, H ;
Nagai, Y ;
Maehama, T ;
Sakumoto, K ;
Kanazawa, K ;
Murayama, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (05) :1344-1353
[47]   MRI-Guided Multi-Catheter High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer [J].
Yamazaki, Hideya ;
Masui, Koji ;
Yoshida, Ken ;
Suzuki, Gen ;
Takenaka, Tadashi ;
Yamada, Kei ;
Kotsuma, Tadayuki ;
Takaoka, Yuji ;
Fujiwara, Kei ;
Tanaka, Yutaka ;
Tanaka, Eiichi .
CANCERS, 2025, 17 (05)
[48]   CT-based 3D Dose-Volume Parameter of the Rectum and Late Rectal Complication in Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with High-Dose-Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy [J].
Kato, Shingo ;
Tran Dang Ngoc Linh ;
Ohno, Tatsuya ;
Nakano, Takashi ;
Kiyohara, Hiroki ;
Ohkubo, Yu ;
Kamada, Tadashi .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2010, 51 (02) :215-221
[49]   Bladder-Rectum Spacer Balloon versus Vaginal Gauze Packing in High Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Randomised Study (Part II) [J].
Rai, B. ;
Patel, F. D. ;
Chakraborty, S. ;
Kapoor, R. ;
Sharma, S. C. ;
Kumaravelu, S. ;
Raghukumar, P. ;
Aprem, A. S. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (12) :713-719
[50]   Which Has a Superior Dosimetric Profile in Image-guided High-dose-rate Brachytherapy of Cervix - Tandem Ovoid or Tandem Ring Applicator? [J].
Rangarajan, Ramya .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 50 (01) :55-59