Bioavailability study of two different formulations of azithromycin

被引:2
作者
Ferrante, L [1 ]
Bompadre, S [1 ]
Cingolani, ML [1 ]
Leone, L [1 ]
Ripa, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CAMERINO,FAC PHARM,DEPT BIOL MCA,CAMERINO,ITALY
来源
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL | 1996年 / 57卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0011-393X(96)80036-1
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In a single-dose, balanced, two-period crossover study, we evaluated the bioavailability of two different commercial formulations of azithromycin in 18 healthy male volunteers, Both the test formulation (500-mg tablet) and the reference formulation (500-mg capsule) were administered to each subject, The two treatment phases were separated by a 15-day washout period, Blood samples were drawn before and up to 48 hours after dosing; we used high-performance liquid chromatography to determine drug plasma concentrations, We calculated the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUG), maximum plasma concentration (C-max), and time of maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) for each subject, Logarithmic transformation of the AUC and C-max was used for the statistical analysis and to assess the bioavailability of the two formulations, Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for t(max) In(C-max), and In(AUC) provided the appropriate intrasubject variance estimate to evaluate the 90% confidence interval for the difference between study variables after administration of the test and reference formulations. The ANOVA showed no significant effect in the model other than a subject effect. The intrasubject coefficient of variation indicated that the two formulations were equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 298
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
*FDA DIV BIOPH, 1977, BIOAV PROT GUID ANDA
[2]   COMPARISON OF THE ACID STABILITY OF AZITHROMYCIN AND ERYTHROMYCIN-A [J].
FIESE, EF ;
STEFFEN, SH .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 25 :39-47
[3]   AZITHROMYCIN CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS [J].
LALAK, NJ ;
MORRIS, DL .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1993, 25 (05) :370-374
[4]   COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR DECISION-MAKING IN BIOEQUIVALENCE ASSESSMENT [J].
MANDALLAZ, D ;
MAU, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1981, 37 (02) :213-222
[5]   OPTIMUM NUMERICAL-INTEGRATION METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF AREA-UNDER-THE-CURVE (AUC) AND AREA-UNDER-THE-MOMENT-CURVE (AUMC) [J].
PURVES, RD .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1992, 20 (03) :211-226
[6]   A COMPARISON OF THE 2 ONE-SIDED TESTS PROCEDURE AND THE POWER APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE EQUIVALENCE OF AVERAGE BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
SCHUIRMANN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1987, 15 (06) :657-680
[7]   HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC ASSAY WITH ELECTROCHEMICAL DETECTION FOR AZITHROMYCIN IN SERUM AND TISSUES [J].
SHEPARD, RM ;
DUTHU, GS ;
FERRAINA, RA ;
MULLINS, MA .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY-BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS, 1991, 565 (1-2) :321-337
[8]  
STEINIJANS VW, 1990, INT J CLIN PHARM TH, V28, P105
[9]  
Westlake WJ, 1988, BIOPHARMACEUTICAL ST, P329