Prediction of blowdown of a pressure relief valve using response surface methodology and CFD techniques

被引:22
|
作者
Zhang, Jian [1 ]
Yang, Liu [1 ]
Dempster, William [2 ]
Yu, Xinhai [1 ]
Jia, Jiuhong [1 ]
Tu, Shan-Tung [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Key Lab Pressure Syst & Safety MOE, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Pressure relief valve; Computational fluid dynamics; Transient numerical simulation; Response surface methodology; Backpressure chamber; SAFETY VALVES; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; GAS SERVICE; MODEL; DECOLORATION; OPTIMIZATION; BEHAVIOR; VAPOR; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.01.079
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, parametric assessment of the main geometric design features of a pressure relief valve (PRV) with a backpressure chamber and two adjusting rings was conducted using response surface methodology. This design approach was established by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to model the dynamic performance of the opening and closing of a nuclear power main steam pressure relief valve (NPMS PRV). An experimental facility was established to test the NPMS PRV in accordance with the standard ASME PTC 25, and to validate the CFD model. It was found that the model can accurately simulate the dynamic performance of the NPMS PRV; the difference in blowdown between the simulation and experiment results is found to be below 0.6%. Thus, the model can be used as part of a design analysis tool. The backpressure chamber assisted in the resealing and decreased the blowdown of the NPMS PRV from 18.13% to 5.50%. The sensitivity to valve geometry was investigated, and an explicit relationship between blowdown and valve geometry was established (with a relative error less than 1%) using the response surface methodology; this will allow designers to assess the valve settings without the need for a CFD model.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 726
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Detailed Fluid Mechanical Analysis on Pressure Relief Valve Blowdown
    Safrany, Peter
    Hos, Csaba
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 69 (01): : 73 - 82
  • [2] Prediction of gas-solid nozzle performance based on CFD and response surface methodology
    Ma, Hui
    Ren, Wangxing
    Yao, Fei
    Cheng, Bang
    Sun, Zhenjiao
    Deng, Haowen
    Gao, Kang
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 442
  • [3] Optimization design for throttle valve of managed pressure drilling based on CFD erosion simulation and response surface methodology
    Wang, Guo R.
    Chu, Fei
    Tao, Si Y.
    Jiang, Long
    Zhu, Hao
    WEAR, 2015, 338 : 114 - 121
  • [4] Prediction of Erosion of Polyetherimide and Its Composites Using Response Surface Methodology
    Thakre, Avinash A.
    JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2015, 137 (01):
  • [5] Investigating the Impact of Operating Conditions on Relief Pressure Valve Flow through CFD and Statistical Analysis
    Cana, Petrica
    Ripeanu, Razvan George
    Patirnac, Iulian
    Dinita, Alin
    Tanase, Maria
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (12)
  • [6] Evaluation of elliptical finned-tube heat exchanger performance using CFD and response surface methodology
    Sun, Lei
    Zhang, Chun-Lu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2014, 75 : 45 - 53
  • [7] Prediction of Surface Roughness in Turning of EN 353 Using Response Surface Methodology
    Bhardwaj, Bhuvnesh
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Singh, Pradeep K.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF METALS, 2014, 67 (03) : 305 - 313
  • [8] Prediction of maximum permeate flux (%) of disc membrane using response surface methodology (RSM)
    Banik, Anirban
    Dutta, Suman
    Bandyopadhyay, Tarun Kanti
    Biswal, Sushant Kumar
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 46 (04) : 299 - 307
  • [9] ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF A TWO-WAY VALVE USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY\
    Vacca, Andrea
    Cerutti, Matteo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FLUID POWER, 2007, 8 (03) : 43 - 57
  • [10] Modeling for prediction of surface roughness in drilling MDF panels using response surface methodology
    Prakash, S.
    Palanikumar, K.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2011, 45 (16) : 1639 - 1646