Evaluating Nasalance Values Among Bilingual Mandarin-English Speakers

被引:10
作者
Pua, Eshan [1 ]
Holt, Yolanda [1 ]
Kollara, Lakshmi [2 ]
Rangarathnam, Balaji [1 ]
Fang, Xiangming [3 ]
Perry, Jamie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 3310Q Allied Hlth Sci, Greenville, NC 27834 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Clin Hlth Sci, Kingsville, TX USA
[3] East Carolina Univ, Dept Biostat, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
Mandarin; Chinese; English; nasalance; nasometer; resonance; SCORES; SPEECH; GENDER;
D O I
10.1177/1055665618791942
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The goals of this research are (I) to establish normative nasalance values for bilingual Mandarin-English speakers and compare values to those of previously reported monolingual Mandarin speakers, and (2) to examine whether sex, age, dialect, and language proficiency affect levels of nasalance among Mandarin-English speakers in both English and Mandarin. Design: All participants recorded the speech stimuli, constructed to include oral sentences, nasal sentences, oronasal sentences, and vowels /a, i, u/ in Mandarin and English. Nasalance measurements were recorded using the Nasometer II 6450. Participants and Setting: A total of 45 (20 males and 25 females) native Mandarin speakers between 20 and 54 years of age from mainland China participated in the study. Results: Mean nasalance scores of the Mandarin oral sentence (Mean [M] = 17.64, standard deviation [SD] = 7.33), oronasal sentence (M = 54.62, SD = 7.81), and nasal sentence (M = 68.73, SD = 8.09) are reported. Mean nasalance scores of the English oral sentence (M = 20.02, SD = 7.83), oronasal sentence (M = 58.71, SD = 7.59), and nasal sentence (M = 65.27, SD = 7.45) are reported. A repeated measures analysis of variance showed significant sex difference in nasalance scores for English stimuli (P = .031) and Mandarin stimuli (P = .040). There was no significant effects of age, dialect, and language proficiency on Mandarin or English stimuli. Conclusions: This is the first study to report normative values for Mandarin-English speakers using the Nasometer II. Values reported can be used for objective assessment of bilingual speakers.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 470
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MODERN CANTONESE PHO, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110823707
[3]   Dialectical Effects on Nasalance: A Multicenter, Cross-Continental Study [J].
Awan, Shaheen N. ;
Bressmann, Tim ;
Poburka, Bruce ;
Roy, Nelson ;
Sharp, Helen ;
Watts, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 58 (01) :69-77
[4]   Influence of gender and age on the Nasality Severity Index 2.0 in Dutch-speaking Flemish children and adults [J].
Bettens, Kim ;
Wuyts, Floris L. ;
Jonckheere, Lisa ;
Platbrood, Shanah ;
Van Lierde, Kristiane .
LOGOPEDICS PHONIATRICS VOCOLOGY, 2017, 42 (03) :133-140
[5]   Same noses, different nasalance scores: Data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis [J].
Bressmann, T ;
Klaiman, P ;
Fischbach, S .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2006, 20 (2-3) :163-170
[6]   Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System [J].
Bressmann, T .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (04) :423-433
[7]  
Catford J.C., 1974, CONTRASTIVE STUDY EN
[8]   Normative standards for nasal cross-sectional areas by race as measured by acoustic rhinometry [J].
Corey, JP ;
Gungor, A ;
Nelson, R ;
Liu, XL ;
Fredberg, J .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1998, 119 (04) :389-393
[9]  
DALSTON RM, 1992, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V29, P17, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0017:RVOVSP>2.3.CO
[10]  
2