Decision Making by Austin, Texas, Residents in Hypothetical Tornado Scenarios

被引:236
作者
Schultz, David M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,8 ]
Gruntfest, Eve C.
Hayden, Mary H. [5 ]
Benight, Charles C. [6 ]
Drobot, Sheldon [5 ]
Barnes, Lindsey R. [7 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Meteorol Inst, FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, Div Atmospher Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Manchester, Ctr Atmospher Sci, Sch Earth Atmospher & Environm Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Cooperat Inst Mesoscale Meteorol Studies, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[5] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Res Applicat Lab, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol, Colorado Springs, CO 80933 USA
[7] enXco, Denver, CO USA
[8] NOAA, Natl Severe Storms Lab, Norman, OK 73069 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2010WCAS1067.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the goals of the Warning Project is to understand how people receive warnings of hazardous weather and subsequently use this information to make decisions. As part of the project, 519 surveys from Austin, Texas, floodplain residents were collected and analyzed. About 90% of respondents understood that a tornado warning represented a more serious and more likely threat than a tornado watch. Most respondents (86%) were not concerned about a limited number of false alarms or close calls reducing their confidence in future warnings, suggesting no cry-wolf effect. Most respondents reported safe decisions in two hypothetical scenarios: a tornado warning issued while the respondent was home and a tornado visible by the respondent while driving. However, nearly half the respondents indicated that they would seek shelter from a tornado under a highway overpass if they were driving. Despite the limitations of this study, these results suggest that more education is needed on the dangers of highway overpasses as shelter from severe weather.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 254
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P1061, DOI DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081LT
[2]  
1061
[3]   Predictors for people's response to a tornado warning: Arkansas, 1 March 1997 [J].
Balluz, L ;
Schieve, L ;
Holmes, T ;
Kiezak, S ;
Malilay, J .
DISASTERS, 2000, 24 (01) :71-77
[4]  
Barnes L.R., 2007, Weather Forecasting, V24, P1452
[5]   False alarms and close calls: A conceptual model of warning accuracy [J].
Barnes, Lindsey R. ;
Gruntfest, Eve C. ;
Hayden, Mary H. ;
Schultz, David M. ;
Benight, Charles .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2007, 22 (05) :1140-1147
[6]  
Bartlett J, 2005, THESIS OKLAHOMA STAT
[7]  
Benight C. C., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.07.002
[8]  
Brown S, 2002, WEATHER FORECAST, V17, P343, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0343:TRDAII>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Risk of tornado-related death and injury in Oklahoma, May 3, 1999 [J].
Daley, WR ;
Brown, S ;
Archer, P ;
Kruger, E ;
Jordan, F ;
Batts, D ;
Mallonee, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 161 (12) :1144-1150