Risk factors and microbiology of wound infections following cesarean delivery: Experience of a single institution

被引:7
作者
Ilhan, Gulsah [1 ]
Atmaca, Fatma Ferda Verit [1 ]
Kaya, Abdurrahman [2 ]
Ergin, Ahmet Hasan [1 ]
Karasu, Ayse Filiz Gokmen [3 ]
Turfan, Mehtap [4 ]
机构
[1] Suleymaniye Res & Educ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Suleymaniye Res & Educ Hosp, Infect Dis, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Suleymaniye Res & Educ Hosp, Microbiol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Cesarean; Prophylaxis; Wound infection;
D O I
10.1016/j.jiac.2016.07.001
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Aims: To determine the prevalence of wound infection following cesarean delivery, risk factors, common bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity. Material-method: The study population consisted of 5787 cesarean deliveries. All of the patients received 2 g doses of cephazolin perioperatively for antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients with wound infection who had two doses of 1 g cephazolin postoperatively and who were continued on oral preparations of 500 mg of cephuroxime twice daily for 5 days after hospital discharge were included in Group A. Patients with wound infection whose postoperative antibiotics and antibiotics after discharge were omitted were included in Group B. Patient related variables, gestational age, co-morbidities, cesarean section indications, neonatal intensive care requirements were assessed. Risk factors were evaluated according to the type of the procedure (elective or emergent) and administered antibiotic protocol. Results: The incidence of wound infection following cesarean section was 0,37% in elective operations and 5,4% in emergency cases. On the other hand, wound infection rate was found to be 1,35% in antibiotic receiving group (Group A) and 1,12% in the group not receiving antibiotics (Group B). Conclusion: Increased rate of wound infections were remarkable in emergency cases and postoperative antibiotics did not have a major impact in reducing the rate of wound infection following cesarean section. (C) 2016 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 670
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
Hopkins L., 1999, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DOI [DOI 10.1002/14651858, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001136]
[12]  
Lilani S P, 2005, Indian J Med Microbiol, V23, P249
[13]   Topical Antimicrobial Therapy for Treating Chronic Wounds [J].
Lipsky, Benjamin A. ;
Hoey, Christopher .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (10) :1541-1549
[14]   Surgical-site infections following cesarean section in an Estonian University Hospital: Postdischarge surveillance and analysis of risk factors [J].
Mitt, P ;
Lang, K ;
Peri, A ;
Maimets, M .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) :449-454
[15]  
Normand M C, 2001, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V30, P642, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb00011.x
[16]  
Ogunsola FT, 1998, J NIGER INFECT CONTR, V1, P14
[17]  
Oliveira JCC, 2001, REV BRAS COLOPROCTOL, V21, P75
[18]  
ROBERTS S, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P383
[19]   Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries [J].
Schneid-Kofman, N ;
Sheiner, E ;
Levy, A ;
Holcberg, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 90 (01) :10-15
[20]  
SHERERTZ RJ, 1992, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V13, P599