Parents' received and expected information about their child's radiation exposure during radiographic examinations

被引:12
|
作者
Oikarinen, Helja T. [1 ]
Perttu, Anne M. [1 ]
Mahajan, Helena M. [1 ]
Ukkola, Leila H. [1 ]
Tervonen, Osmo A. [1 ]
Jussila, Aino-Liisa I. [2 ]
Henner, Anja O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oulu Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, POB 50, Oys Oulu 90029, Finland
[2] Oulu Univ Appl Sci, Kiviharjuntie 4, Oulu 90220, Finland
关键词
Children; Communication; Informed consent; Ionising radiation; Radiography; MEDICAL RADIATION; CANCER-RISKS; KNOWLEDGE; COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIANS; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-018-4300-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundDespite regulations, insufficient information is provided to adult patients prior to their radiologic examinations. Information regarding paediatric patients has not been systematically studied.ObjectiveTo survey parents' experience and wishes for information in connection with their child's radiographic examination.Materials and methodsWe provided a questionnaire to consenting parents of children younger than 12years old at a university hospital. The questionnaire asked parents about the information obtained from the referrer prior to the radiograph, the chance to discuss with the referrer and their wishes regarding future information. Forty-one parents responded to the survey. Twenty-five children were referred for radiography of extremities, the others for dental, body and skull examinations.ResultsAltogether 34/41 (83%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 69-91%) parents said they received adequate information on the purpose of the examination, 8/35 (23%, 95% CI 12-39%) on other options and 3/41 (7%, 95% CI 3-19%) on radiation dose. Ten of 41 parents (24%, 95% CI 12-40%) said they were aware of radiation exposure. The number of previous radiology examinations was not sufficiently discussed. The communication was scored as mean 6.5 (95% CI 5.8-7.1) on a scale from 4 (poor) to 10 (excellent). Thirty-eight of 40 (95%, 95% CI 84-99%) of parents expected information on the purpose, 35/40 (88%, 95% CI 74-95%) on radiation dose and 31/40 (78%, 95% CI 63-88%) on other options. Symbols of radiation and corresponding period of natural background radiation are preferred to convey the dose. A referrer is the preferred source of information.ConclusionParents did not feel adequately informed prior to their child's radiographic examination. Parents expect more information about the purpose, dose and alternative tests.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nationwide survey of radiation exposure during pediatric computed tomography examinations and proposal of age-based diagnostic reference levels for Japan
    Takei, Yasutaka
    Miyazaki, Osamu
    Matsubara, Kosuke
    Shimada, Yoshiya
    Muramatsu, Yoshihisa
    Akahane, Keiichi
    Fujii, Keisuke
    Suzuki, Shoichi
    Koshida, Kichiro
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 46 (02) : 280 - 285
  • [42] THE AWARENESS OF CAREGIVERS ABOUT THEIR CHILDREN'S EXPOSURE TO IONIZING RADIATION ACCOMPANYING MEDICAL PROCEDURES: THE ASSESSMENT STUDY
    Jonczyk-Potoczna, Katarzyna
    Pucher, Beata
    Strzelczuk-Judka, Lidia
    Buraczynska-Andrzejewska, Beata
    Wieckowska, Barbara
    Krauss, Hanna
    Bilinski, Przemyslaw
    Wojtyla-Buciora, Paulina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 32 (01) : 65 - 73
  • [43] Extending the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis to Narrative Persuasion: Parents' Information-Seeking Intention and Learning About Adolescent Children's Covid-19 Vaccination
    Lee, Tae Kyoung
    Kim, Hye Kyung
    HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 51 (02) : 270 - 279
  • [44] American Indian Parents' Assessment of and Concern About Their Kindergarten Child's Weight Status, South Dakota, 2005-2006
    Arcan, Chrisa
    Hannan, Peter J.
    Himes, John H.
    Fulkerson, Jayne A.
    Rock, Bonnie Holy
    Smyth, Mary
    Story, Mary
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2012, 9
  • [45] Parents' evaluation of the IDEFICS intervention: an analysis focussing on socio-economic factors, child's weight status and intervention exposure
    Nicholls, S. G.
    Pohlabeln, H.
    De Bourdeaudhuij, I.
    Chadjigeorgiou, C.
    Gwozdz, W.
    Hebestreit, A.
    Lauria, F.
    Lissner, L.
    Molnar, D.
    Santaliestra-Pasias, A. M.
    Veidebaum, T.
    Williams, G.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2015, 16 : 103 - 118
  • [46] Women's perceptions of information about alcohol use during pregnancy: a qualitative study
    Anderson, Amy E.
    Hure, Alexis J.
    Kay-Lambkin, Frances J.
    Loxton, Deborah J.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [47] Parent-child contact during parent's incarceration: A study of children of incarcerated parents in southern Ghana
    Amankwaa, Afua
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2020, 109
  • [48] Do parents care about TV? how parent factors mediate US children's media exposure and receptive vocabulary
    Schlesinger, Molly A.
    Flynn, Rachel M.
    Richert, Rebekah A.
    JOURNAL OF CHILDREN AND MEDIA, 2019, 13 (04) : 395 - 414
  • [49] How 'significant others' may support parents with decision-making about their child's cancer care: An integrative literature review
    Jestico, Elizabeth C. L.
    Schutz, Susan E.
    Finlay, Teresa M. D.
    Appleton, Jane V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (9-10) : 1821 - 1840
  • [50] Parents' views about healthcare professionals having real-time remote access to their young child's diabetes data: Qualitative study
    Kimbell, Barbara
    Rankin, David
    Hart, Ruth I.
    Allen, Janet M.
    Boughton, Charlotte K.
    Campbell, Fiona
    Froehlich-Reiterer, Elke
    Hofer, Sabine E.
    Kapellen, Thomas M.
    Rami-Merhar, Birgit
    Schierloh, Ulrike
    Thankamony, Ajay
    Ware, Julia
    Hovorka, Roman
    Lawton, Julia
    PEDIATRIC DIABETES, 2022, 23 (06) : 799 - 808