Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil

被引:0
作者
da Silva, Shana Ginar [1 ]
Bertoldi, Andrea Damaso [2 ]
da Silveira, Mariangela Freitas [2 ]
Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues [3 ]
Evenson, Kelly R. [4 ]
dos Santos, Ina Silva [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Fac Med, Programa Posgrad Epidemiol, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pelotas, Fac Med, Programa Posgrad Epidemiol, Dept Med Social, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pelotas, Escola Super Educ Fis, Dept Desportos, Programa Posgrad Educ Fis, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
来源
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2019年 / 53卷
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Reproductive Techniques; Assisted; Fertilization in Vitro; Embryo Transfer; Insemination; Artificial; Risk Factors; Socioeconomic Factors; Low-Middle Income Countries; POPULATION; OUTCOMES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Global cultural and socioeconomic factors that influence access to assisted reproductive technologies [J].
Adamson, G. David .
WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 5 (04) :351-358
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 7 REP NAT EMBR PROD
[3]  
[Anonymous], ASS REPR TECHN FERT
[4]  
Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil, ATL DES HUM BRAS
[5]   Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHREaEuro [J].
Calhaz-Jorge, C. ;
de Geyter, C. ;
Kupka, M. S. ;
de Mouzon, J. ;
Erb, K. ;
Mocanu, E. ;
Motrenko, T. ;
Scaravelli, G. ;
Wyns, C. ;
Goossens, V. ;
Gliozheni, Orion ;
Strohmer, Heinz ;
Petrovskaya, Elena ;
Tishkevich, Oleg ;
Wyns, Christine ;
Bogaerts, Kris ;
Antonova, Irena ;
Vrcic, Hrvoje ;
Ljiljak, Dejan ;
Rezabek, Karel ;
Markova, Jitka ;
Lemmen, Josephine ;
Erb, Karin ;
Soritsa, Deniss ;
Gissler, Mika ;
Tiitinen, Aila ;
Royere, Dominique ;
Tandler-Schneider, Andreas ;
Uszkoriet, Monika ;
Loutradis, Dimitris ;
Tarlatzis, Basil C. ;
Urbancsek, Janos ;
Kosztolanyi, G. ;
Bjorgvinsson, Hilmar ;
Mocanu, Edgar ;
Scaravelli, Giulia ;
Lokshin, Vyacheslav ;
Ravil, Valiyev ;
Gudleviciene, Zivile ;
Lopes, Giedre Belo ;
Moshin, Veaceslav ;
Simic, Tatjana Motrenko ;
Vukicevic, Dragana ;
Romundstad, Liv Bente ;
Kurzawa, Rafael ;
Calhaz-Jorge, Carlos ;
Laranjeira, Ana Rita ;
Rugescu, Ioana ;
Doroftei, Bogdan ;
Korsak, Vladislav .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (08) :1638-1652
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[7]  
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
[8]  
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2012, NAT SUMM REP
[9]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention American Society for Reproductive Medicine Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2005, 2005 ASS REPR TECHN
[10]  
Centers of Disease Control and Prevention, 2014, ASS REPR TECHN SURV