Economic analysis in hand surgery

被引:4
作者
Myers, J
McCabe, S
Gohmann, S
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Sch Publ Hlth & Informat Sci, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2006年 / 31A卷 / 04期
关键词
economic evaluation; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost-benefit analysis; hand surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.02.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Economic analysis is a method for allocating resources among competing alternatives. Four techniques commonly used in an economic analysis are cost-minimization analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-benefit analysis, and cost-utility analysis. These analyses provide information to guide medical decisions and to set funding priorities. Understanding the differences between the techniques allows for better decision making. Although economic analysis is used widely in other fields of medicine, its use in studies of disorders of the hand has been sparse. Only recently has economic analysis been included in studies focused on the care of the upper-extremity patient. As such, to interpret the results of these studies better, hand surgeons need to understand the similarities and differences and the strengths and weaknesses of the different techniques. Such an understanding will allow hand surgeons to know when economic analyses are comparable. Furthermore it will aid them in providing their patients not only medically sound care, but also economically efficient care. This article provides a synopsis of the most widely used and accepted techniques for performing an economic analysis. The key concepts of each of the 4 techniques are shown by using the small number of studies that are available in the upper-extremity literature.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 668
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Management of flexor tendon sheath ganglions: A cost analysis [J].
Bittner, JG ;
Kang, R ;
Stern, PJ .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 27A (04) :586-590
[2]  
Chung RC, 1998, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V102, P1089
[3]  
Collins ED, 1999, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V104, P1936, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199911000-00066
[4]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[5]  
Drummond M.F., 1980, PRINCIPLES EC APPRAI
[6]   COST-UTILITY IN PRACTICE - A POLICY MAKERS GUIDE TO THE STATE-OF-THE-ART [J].
GERARD, K .
HEALTH POLICY, 1992, 21 (03) :249-279
[7]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[8]  
Kamlet MS., 1992, The comparative benefits modeling project: a framework for cost-utility analysis of government health care programs
[9]   New and dis-improved: On the evaluation and use of less effective, less expensive medical interventions [J].
Kent, DM ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Langa, KM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 24 (03) :281-286
[10]  
Luce BR, 1990, STANDARDS SOCIOECONO