Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice

被引:13
作者
Levy, Franck [1 ]
Iacuzio, Laura [1 ]
Civaia, Filippo [1 ]
Rusek, Stephane [1 ]
Dommerc, Carine [1 ]
Hugues, Nicolas [1 ]
Alexandrescu, Clara [1 ]
Dor, Vincent [1 ]
Tribouilloy, Christophe [2 ]
Dreyfus, Gilles [1 ]
机构
[1] Monaco Cardiothorac Ctr, 11 Bis,Ave Ostende, MC-98000 Monaco, Monaco
[2] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, Univ Hosp Amiens, Dept Cardiol, Inserm,U 1088, F-80000 Amiens, France
关键词
Aortic stenosis; 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; VALVE STENOSIS; LOW-GRADIENT; LOW-FLOW; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EJECTION FRACTION; QUANTIFICATION; DISEASE; IMPACT; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.acvd.2016.04.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. - Recently, 1.5-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was reported to provide a reliable alternative to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for the quantification of aortic stenosis (AS) severity. Few data are available using higher magnetic field strength MRI systems in this context. Aims. - To evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of the assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) using 3-Tesla CMR in routine clinical practice, and to assess concordance between TTE and CMR for the estimation of AS severity. Methods. - Ninety-one consecutive patients (60 men; mean age 74 +/- 10 years) with known AS documented by TTE were included prospectively in the study. Results. - All patients underwent comprehensive TTE and CMR examination, including AVA estimation using the TTE continuity equation (0.81 +/- 0.18 cm(2)), direct CMR planimetry (CMRp) (0.90 +/- 0.22 cm(2)) and CMR using Hakki's formula (CMRhk), a simplified Gorlin formula (0.70 +/- 0.19 cm(2)). Although significant agreement with TTE was found for CMRp (r=0.72) and CMRhk (r = 0.66), CMRp slightly overestimated (bias= 0.11 +/- 0.18 cm(2)) and CMRhk slightly underestimated (bias = 0.11 +/- 0.17 cm(2)) AVA compared with TTE. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibilities of CMR measurements were excellent (r= 0.72 and r= 0.74 for CMRp and r= 0.88 and r=0.92 for peak aortic velocity, respectively). Conclusion. - 3-Tesla CMR is a feasible, radiation-free, reproducible imaging modality for the estimation of severity of AS in routine practice, knowing that CMRp tends to overestimate AVA and CMRhk to underestimate AVA compared with TTE. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 625
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Aortic Valve Area, Stroke Volume, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Remodeling, and Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison Between High and Low Gradient and Normal and Low Flow Aortic Stenosis [J].
Barone-Rochette, Gilles ;
Pierard, Sophie ;
Seldrum, Stephanie ;
de Ravenstein, Christophe de Meester ;
Melchior, Julie ;
Maes, Frederic ;
Pouleur, Anne-Catherine ;
Vancraeynest, David ;
Pasquet, Agnes ;
Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis ;
Gerber, Bernhard L. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (06) :1009-1017
[2]   Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis comparison with echocardiography [J].
Caruthers, SD ;
Lin, SJ ;
Brown, P ;
Watkins, MP ;
Williams, TA ;
Lehr, KA ;
Wickline, SA .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (18) :2236-2243
[3]   Impact of Aortic Valve Calcification, as Measured by MDCT, on Survival in Patients With Aortic Stenosis [J].
Clavel, Marie-Annick ;
Pibarot, Philippe ;
Messika-Zeitoun, David ;
Capoulade, Romain ;
Malouf, Joseph ;
Aggarval, Shivani ;
Araoz, Phillip A. ;
Michelena, Hector I. ;
Cueff, Caroline ;
Larose, Eric ;
Miller, Jordan D. ;
Vahanian, Alec ;
Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (12) :1202-1213
[4]   Evaluation of Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Comparison of an Original Semiautomated Analysis of Phase-Contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance With Doppler Echocardiography [J].
Defrance, Carine ;
Bollache, Emilie ;
Kachenoura, Nadjia ;
Perdrix, Ludivine ;
Hrynchyshyn, Nataliya ;
Bruguiere, Eric ;
Redheuil, Alban ;
Diebold, Benoit ;
Mousseaux, Elie .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2012, 5 (05) :604-612
[5]   Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Friedrich, MG ;
Schulz-Menger, J ;
Poetsch, T ;
Pilz, B ;
Uhlich, F ;
Dietz, R .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (02) :329-334
[6]  
Garcia D, 2006, J HEART VALVE DIS, V15, P601
[7]   Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis [J].
Garcia, Julio ;
Kadem, Lyes ;
Larose, Eric ;
Clavel, Marie-Annick ;
Pibarot, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2011, 13
[8]   Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival [J].
Hachicha, Zeineb ;
Dumesnil, Jean G. ;
Bogaty, Peter ;
Pibarot, Philippe .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (22) :2856-2864
[9]  
Harold JG, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V63, pE57, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.014]
[10]   Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems [J].
Hinton, DP ;
Wald, LL ;
Pitts, J ;
Schmitt, F .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) :436-442