'A blessing in disguise' or 'as if it wasn't hard enough already': reciprocal and aggravate vulnerabilities in the supply chain

被引:482
作者
Ivanov, Dmitry [1 ]
机构
[1] Berlin Sch Econ & Law, Supply Chain & Operat Management, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Supply chain dynamics; supply chain engineering; supply chain resilience; supply chain risk management; simulation applications; ripple effect; MITIGATING DISRUPTIONS; RISK-MANAGEMENT; RESILIENCE; NETWORK; SIMULATION; RECOVERY; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; MODEL; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2019.1634850
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We investigate the interrelations of structural and operational vulnerabilities in the supply chain (SC) using discrete-event simulation for a real life case study. We theorise a notion of SC overlays and explore conditions surrounding their appearance. Such overlays occur if the negative consequences of changes in a SC structure as a result of a disruption are either amplified or mitigated by changes in the operational environment. We hypothesise that these overlays can be both reciprocal (i.e. complementary or mitigating) and aggravate (i.e. concurrent or enhancing). Our approach can be used for an efficient management of SC resilience capabilities by varying their levels over time. We show different ripple and bullwhip effect profiles, which lead to either reciprocal or aggravate overlays, and then we develop recommendations on the overlay-driven dynamic variation of resilience capability levels in order to enhance both SC resilience and efficiency through dynamic redundancy allocation. The results can be of value in selecting and deploying operational policies at the right time and scale during and after the recovery periods. Restricting analysis to the disruption period only and ignoring operational dynamics after capacity recovery can result in misleading or inefficient SC resilience and recovery policies.
引用
收藏
页码:3252 / 3262
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Supply Chain Tsunamis: Research on Low-Probability, High-Impact Disruptions
    Akkermans, Henk
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2018, 54 (01) : 64 - 76
  • [2] Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption
    Behzadi, G.
    O'Sullivan, M. J.
    Olsen, T. L.
    Zhang, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (10) : 3524 - 3546
  • [3] An Empirically Derived Framework of Global Supply Resiliency
    Blackhurst, Jennifer
    Dunn, Kaitlin S.
    Craighead, Christopher W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2011, 32 (04) : 374 - 391
  • [4] A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing
    Cavalcante, Ian M.
    Frazzon, Enzo M.
    Forcellini, Fernando A.
    Ivanov, Dmitry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 : 86 - 97
  • [5] Joint inventory-location problem under the risk of probabilistic facility disruptions
    Chen, Qi
    Li, Xiaopeng
    Ouyang, Yanfeng
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2011, 45 (07) : 991 - 1003
  • [6] CHEN Y, 2017, P 2017 WINT SIM C
  • [7] DOLGUI A, 2019, INT J PROD RES 0614
  • [8] Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature
    Dolgui, Alexandre
    Ivanov, Dmitry
    Sokolov, Boris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (1-2) : 414 - 430
  • [9] Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment Empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry
    Dubey, Rameshwar
    Altay, Nezih
    Gunasekaran, Angappa
    Blome, Constantin
    Papadopoulos, Thanos
    Childe, Stephen J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (01) : 129 - 148
  • [10] Dubey R, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V193, P63, DOI [10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.029, 10.1109/TEM.2017.2723042]