Three-Dimensional Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography for Glenoid Bone Assessment

被引:51
作者
de Mello, Ricardo Andrade Fernandes [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Ya-jun [1 ]
Ashir, Aria [1 ]
Jerban, Saeed [1 ]
Hoenecke, Heinz [3 ]
Carl, Michael [4 ]
Du, Jiang [1 ]
Chang, Eric Y. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Dept Internal Med, Av Marechal Campos 1468, BR-29057630 Vitoria, ES, Brazil
[3] Scripps Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg & Sports Med, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[4] GE Healthcare, San Diego, CA USA
[5] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, Radiol Serv, San Diego, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUANTIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; AGREEMENT; MODALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.042
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique and compare it with 3D computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of the glenoid bone. Methods: ZTE MRI using multiple resolutions and multislice CT were performed in 6 shoulder specimens before and after creation of glenoid defects and in 10 glenohumeral instability patients. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently generated 3D volume-rendered images of the glenoid en face. Post-processing times and glenoid widths were measured. Inter-modality and inter-rater agreement was assessed. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for inter-modality assessment showed almost perfect agreement for both readers, ranging from 0.949 to 0.991 for the ex vivo study and from 0.955 to 0.987 for the in vivo patients. Excellent interobserver agreement was found for both the ex vivo (ICCs >= 0.98) and in vivo (ICCs >= 0.92) studies. For the ex vivo study, Bland-Altman analyses for CT versus MRI showed a mean difference of 0.6 to 1 mm at 1.0-mm(3) MRI resolution, 0.3 to 0.6 mm at 0.8-mm(3) MRI resolution, and 0.3 to 0.6 mm at 0.6-mm(3) MRI resolution for both readers. For the in vivo study, Bland-Altman analyses for CT versus MRI showed a mean difference of 0.6 to 0.8 mm at 1.0-mm(3) MRI resolution, 0.5 to 0.6 mm at 0.8-mm(3) MRI resolution, and 0.4 to 0.8 mm at 0.7-mm(3) MRI resolution for both readers. Mean post-processing times to generate 3D images of the glenoid ranged from 32 to 46 seconds for CT and from 33 to 64 seconds for ZTE MRI. Conclusions: Three-dimensional ZTE MRI can potentially be considered as a technique to determine glenoid width and can be readily incorporated into the clinical workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2400
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   3-D CT is the Most Reliable Imaging Modality When Quantifying Glenoid Bone Loss [J].
Bishop, Julie Y. ;
Jones, Grant L. ;
Rerko, Michael A. ;
Donaldson, Chris .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (04) :1251-1256
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Evaluation of Osseous Morphology of the Hip Using Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Breighner, Ryan E. ;
Bogner, Eric A. ;
Lee, Susan C. ;
Koff, Matthew F. ;
Potter, Hollis G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (14) :3460-3468
[4]   Zero Echo Time Imaging of the Shoulder: Enhanced Osseous Detail by Using MR Imaging [J].
Breighner, Ryan E. ;
Endo, Yoshimi ;
Konin, Gabrielle P. ;
Gulotta, Lawrence V. ;
Koff, Matthew F. ;
Potter, Hollis G. .
RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (03) :968-974
[5]   Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: Significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion [J].
Burkhart, SS ;
De Beer, JF .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2000, 16 (07) :677-694
[6]   UTE Imaging with Simultaneous Water and Fat Signal Suppression Using a Time-Efficient Multispoke Inversion Recovery Pulse Sequence [J].
Carl, Michael ;
Bydder, Graeme M. ;
Du, Jiang .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 76 (02) :577-582
[7]   Does Bone Loss Imaging Modality, Measurement Methodology, and Interobserver Reliability Alter Treatment in Glenohumeral Instability? [J].
Chalmers, Peter N. ;
Christensen, Garrett ;
O'Neill, Dillon ;
Tashjian, Robert Z. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (01) :12-19
[8]   UTE Imaging in the Musculoskeletal System [J].
Chang, Eric Y. ;
Du, Jiang ;
Chung, Christine B. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 41 (04) :870-883
[9]   Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability [J].
Chuang, Tai-Yuan ;
Adams, Christopher R. ;
Burkhart, Stephen S. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (04) :376-382
[10]   Clinical Evaluation of Zero-Echo-Time MR Imaging for the Segmentation of the Skull [J].
Delso, Gaspar ;
Wiesinger, Florian ;
Sacolick, Laura I. ;
Kaushik, Sandeep S. ;
Shanbhag, Dattesh D. ;
Huellner, Martin ;
Veit-Haibach, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (03) :417-422