The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants

被引:128
作者
Cornelius, Bert L. R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Groothoff, Johan W. [2 ]
van der Klink, Jac J. L. [1 ,2 ]
Brouwer, Sandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Res Ctr Insurance Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci Community & Occupat Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Social Secur Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Disability; Mental disorder; Screening; CIDI; K10; K6; GHQ-12; Psychometric; Predictive value; MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; ANXIETY; VERSION; VALIDITY; ILLNESS; SCALES; DEPRESSION; SCORES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-13-128
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Screening for mental disorders among disability claimants is important, since mental disorders seem to be seriously under-recognized in this population. However, performance of potentially suitable scales is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of three scales, the 10- and 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10, K6) and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), to predict present state mental disorders, classified according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) among disability claimants. Methods: All scales were completed by a representative sample of persons claiming disability benefit after two years sickness absence (n=293). All diagnoses, both somatic and mental, were included. The gold standard was the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 3.0) to diagnose present state DSM-IV disorder. Cronbach's a, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), and the areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: Cronbach's alpha's were 0.919 (K10), 0.882 (K6) and 0.906 (GHQ-12). The optimal cut-off scores were 24 (K10), 14 (K6) and 20 (GHQ-12). The PPV and the NPV for the optimal cut point of the K10 was 0.53 and 0.89, for the K6 0.51 and 0.87, and for the GHQ-12 0.50 and 0.82. The AUC's for 30-day cases were 0.806 (K10; 95% CI 0.749-0.862), 0.796 (K6; 95% CI 0.737-0.854) and 0.695 (GHQ-12; 95% CI 0.626-0.765). Conclusions: The K10 and K6 are reliable and valid scales to screen for present state DSM-IV mental disorder. The optimal cut-off scores are 24 (K10) and 14 (K6). The GHQ-12 (optimal cut-off score: 20) is outperformed by the K10 and K6, which are to be preferred above the GHQ-12. The scores on separate items of the K10 and K6 can be used in disability assessment settings as an agenda for an in-depth follow-up clinical interview to ascertain the presence of present state mental disorder.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P21
[2]  
Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P8
[3]   The psychometric properties of the composite international diagnostic interview [J].
Andrews, G ;
Peters, L .
SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (02) :80-88
[4]   Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) [J].
Andrews, G ;
Slade, T .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (06) :494-497
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Sick on the Job? Myths and Realities about Mental Health and Work. Mental Health and Work
[6]  
[Anonymous], FINAL VERSIONS NONSP
[7]   A systematic review of the factors which predict return to work for people suffering episodes of poor mental health [J].
Blank, Lindsay ;
Peters, J. ;
Pickvance, S. ;
Wilford, J. ;
MacDonald, E. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 18 (01) :27-34
[8]   Prognostic Factors of Long Term Disability Due to Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review [J].
Cornelius, L. R. ;
van der Klink, J. J. L. ;
Groothoff, J. W. ;
Brouwer, S. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2011, 21 (02) :259-274
[9]   The validity of the Dutch K10 and extended K10 screening scales for depressive and anxiety disorders [J].
Donker, Tara ;
Comijs, Hannie ;
Cuijpers, Pim ;
Terluin, Berend ;
Nolen, Willem ;
Zitman, Frans ;
Penninx, Brenda .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2010, 176 (01) :45-50
[10]   MJA practice essentials .3. Assessment of anxiety and depression in primary care [J].
Ellen, SR ;
Norman, TR ;
Burrows, GD .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1997, 167 (06) :328-333