Can prospect theory be used to predict an investor's willingness to pay?

被引:18
作者
Erner, Carsten [1 ]
Klos, Alexander [2 ]
Langer, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Finance Ctr Muenster, D-48143 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Inst Quantitat Business & Econ Res, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
关键词
Cumulative prospect theory; Preference elicitation; Retail investor; Behavioral finance; Structured financial product; PROBABILITY WEIGHTING FUNCTION; LOSS AVERSION; STRUCTURED PRODUCTS; FINANCIAL PRODUCTS; RISK PERCEPTIONS; UTILITY-THEORY; ELICITATION; ATTITUDES; DECISION; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) is widely considered to be the most successful descriptive theory for decision making under risk and uncertainty. Sophisticated methods have been developed to reliably elicit CPT parameters on an individual basis. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether such methods are suited to be applied in real world situations, particularly in the context of investment counseling for retail investors. Specifically, we examine whether CPT parameters elicited via standardized computer tools are successful in predicting an individual's preference for different structured financial products. Surprisingly, we find only low predictive power of the elicited CPT parameters on the WTP. Using a second set of experiments, we examine possible explanations for the low prediction quality. Overall, we have to conclude that it is too much of a leap to draw conclusions about the attractiveness of complex financial products from CPT parameters elicited via simple lotteries. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1960 / 1973
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty [J].
Abdellaoui, M ;
Vossmann, F ;
Weber, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (09) :1384-1399
[2]   A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
L'Haridon, Olivier .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2008, 36 (03) :245-266
[3]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[4]   The Age of Reason: Financial Decisions over the Life Cycle and Implications for Regulation [J].
Agarwal, Sumit ;
Gabaix, Xavier ;
Driscoll, John C. ;
Laibson, David .
BROOKINGS PAPERS ON ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, 2009, (02) :51-117
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches
[6]  
Barclays Wealth, 2008, OPT BEH ISS 2 NOT ME
[7]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[8]  
Bethel JE, 2007, NEW FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS: OPPORTUNITIES AND POLICY CHALLENGES, P167
[9]   Evidence against prospect theories in gambles with positive, negative, and mixed consequences [J].
Birnbaum, Michael H. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 27 (06) :737-761
[10]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654