Examination of three theories for mechanisms of cation-induced bioflocculation

被引:487
作者
Sobeck, DC
Higgins, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Bucknell Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA
[2] Carollo Engineers, Phoenix, AZ 85018 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
bioflocculation; DLVO; activated sludge; settling; dewatering;
D O I
10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00254-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research from different studies has been used to support three different theories pertaining to the role of cations in bioflocculation. These theories are the alginate theory, Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek (DLVO) theory, and divalent cation bridging (DCB) theory. The objectives of this research were to examine the role of cations in bioflocculation to determine which theory, if any, best describes cation induced bioflocculation. Experiments were performed using laboratory scale activated sludge systems with bactopeptone as a feed. The feed was supplemented with either calcium, magnesium, or sodium at increasing concentrations. Floe properties were analyzed in each reactor during steady state periods. The addition of calcium or magnesium to the feed individually resulted in improvements in SVI, CST, SRF, cake solids and floe strength and each of these divalent cations produced similar results. The addition of sodium to the feed resulted in a deterioration in floe properties relative to a control reactor. Analysis of these results suggest that the DCB theory best explains the role of cations. The discrepancies between different studies were examined and are thought to be a result of different experimental procedures in different studies and in particular the use of short-term batch tests versus continuous flow reactor studies. In addition, the implications of DCB theory suggests that activated sludge systems should attempt to lower the ratio of monovalent to divalent cations to improve floe properties and treatment performance. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 538
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] ADAMSON AW, 1990, PHYSICAL CHEM SURFAC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, STAND METH EX WAT WA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1980, WATER POLLUT CONTROL
  • [4] Arden E., 1914, J SOC CHEM IND LOND, V33, P1122, DOI [10.1002/jctb.5000332304, DOI 10.1002/JCTB.5000332304]
  • [5] Ardern E., 1914, Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, V33, P523, DOI DOI 10.1002/JCTB.5000331005
  • [6] ARDERN E, 1917, J SOC CHEM IND LOND, V36, P822
  • [7] Ardern E, 1915, J SOC CHEM IND LOND, V34, P937
  • [8] BARBER JB, 1986, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V58, P149
  • [9] COMPARISON OF BACTERIAL EXTRACELLULAR POLYMER EXTRACTION METHODS
    BROWN, MJ
    LESTER, JN
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1980, 40 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [10] ON THE STABILITY OF ACTIVATED-SLUDGE FLOCS WITH IMPLICATIONS TO DEWATERING
    BRUUS, JH
    NIELSEN, PH
    KEIDING, K
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 1992, 26 (12) : 1597 - 1604