Effects of preselection of genotyped animals on reliability and bias of genomic prediction in dairy cattle

被引:2
|
作者
Togashi, Kenji [1 ]
Adachi, Kazunori [2 ]
Kurogi, Kazuhito [1 ]
Yasumori, Takanori [2 ]
Tokunaka, Kouichi [2 ]
Ogino, Atsushi [1 ]
Miyazaki, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Watanabe, Toshio [1 ]
Takahashi, Tsutomu [2 ]
Moribe, Kimihiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Livestock Improvement Assoc Japan, Maebashi Inst Anim Sci, Maebashi, Gunma 3710121, Japan
[2] Livestock Improvement Assoc Japan, Koto Ku, Tokyo 1350041, Japan
来源
ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES | 2019年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Reliability of Selection; Genomic Selection; Reference Population; Dairy Cattle; REFERENCE POPULATION; SELECTION; COWS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.5713/ajas.18.0161
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Objective: Models for genomic selection assume that the reference population is an unselected population. However, in practice, genotyped individuals, such as progeny-tested bulls, are highly selected, and the reference population is created after preselection. In dairy cattle, the intensity of selection is higher in males than in females, suggesting that cows can be added to the reference population with less bias and loss of accuracy. The objective is to develop formulas applied to any genomic prediction studies or practice with preselected animals as reference population. Methods: We developed formulas for calculating the reliability and bias of genomically enhanced breeding values (GEBV) in the reference population where individuals are preselected on estimated breeding values. Based on the formulas presented, deterministic simulation was conducted by varying heritability, preselection percentage, and the reference population size. Results: The number of bulls equal to a cow regarding the reliability of GEBV was expressed through a simple formula for the reference population consisting of preselected animals. The bull population was vastly superior to the cow population regarding the reliability of GEBV for low-heritability traits. However, the superiority of reliability from the bull reference population over the cow population decreased as heritability increased. Bias was greater for bulls than cows. Bias and reduction in reliability of GEBV due to preselection was alleviated by expanding reference population. Conclusion: Cows are easier in expanding reference population size compared with bulls and alleviate bias and reduction in reliability of GEBV of bulls which are highly preselected than cows by expanding the cow reference population.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 169
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Marker Pruning Strategies Based on Different Measurements of Marker Distance on Genomic Prediction in Dairy Cattle
    Ren, Duanyang
    Teng, Jinyan
    Diao, Shuqi
    Lin, Qing
    Li, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Zhe
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [32] Graphical Model Selection to Infer the Partial Correlation Network of Allelic Effects in Genomic Prediction With an Application in Dairy Cattle
    Martinez, Carlos A.
    Khare, Kshitij
    Rahman, Syed
    Baez, Giovanni M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2025,
  • [33] The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population
    Dehnavi, E.
    Mahyari, S. Ansari
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Sargolzaei, M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (06) : 5166 - 5176
  • [34] Effects of a breeding scheme combined by genomic pre-selection and progeny testing on annual genetic gain in a dairy cattle population
    Yamazaki, Takeshi
    Togashi, Kenji
    Iwama, Satoru
    Matsumoto, Shigeo
    Moribe, Kimihiro
    Nakanishi, Takatoshi
    Hagiya, Koichi
    Hayasaka, Kiyoshi
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2014, 85 (06) : 639 - 649
  • [35] Effects of marker density and minor allele frequency on genomic prediction for growth traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle
    Zhu Bo
    Zhang Jing-jing
    Niu Hong
    Guan Long
    Guo Peng
    Xu Ling-yang
    Chen Yan
    Zhang Lu-pei
    Gao Hui-jiang
    Gao Xue
    Li Jun-ya
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2017, 16 (04) : 911 - 920
  • [36] Comparing deregression methods for genomic prediction of test-day traits in dairy cattle
    de Oliveira, H. R.
    Silva, F. F.
    Brito, L. F.
    Guarini, A. R.
    Jamrozik, J.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [37] Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny
    Koivula, M.
    Stranden, I.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (02) : 107 - 115
  • [38] Enteric Methane Emissions Prediction in Dairy Cattle and Effects of Monensin on Methane Emissions: A Meta-Analysis
    Marumo, Joyce L.
    LaPierre, P. Andrew
    Van Amburgh, Michael E.
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [39] Fixed-length haplotypes can improve genomic prediction accuracy in an admixed dairy cattle population
    Hess, Melanie
    Druet, Tom
    Hess, Andrew
    Garrick, Dorian
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49
  • [40] GPS Coordinates for Modelling Correlated Herd Effects in Genomic Prediction Models Applied to Hanwoo Beef Cattle
    Cuyabano, Beatriz Castro Dias
    Rovere, Gabriel
    Lim, Dajeong
    Kim, Tae Hun
    Lee, Hak Kyo
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Gondro, Cedric
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (07):