Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations

被引:1428
作者
Rivard, MJ [1 ]
Coursey, BM
DeWerd, LA
Hanson, WF
Huq, MS
Ibbott, GS
Mitch, MG
Nath, R
Williamson, JF
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Ionizing Radiat Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Accredited Dosimetry & Calibrat Lab, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Radiol Phys Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Yale Univ, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[7] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Radiat Therapy Comm, Low Energy Intersitial Brachytherapy Dosimetry Su, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
TG-43; brachytherapy dosimetry protocol; TLD dosimetry; Monte Carlo calculations; I-125; Pd-103;
D O I
10.1118/1.1646040
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Since publication of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group No. 43 Report in 1995 (TG-43), both the utilization of permanent source implantation and the number of low-energy interstitial brachytherapy source models commercially available have dramatically increased. In addition, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has introduced a new primary standard of air-kerma strength, and the brachytherapy dosimetry literature has grown substantially, documenting both improved dosimetry methodologies and dosimetric characterization of particular source models. In response to these advances, the AAPM Low-energy Interstitial Brachytherapy Dosimetry subcommittee (LIBD) herein presents an update of the TG-43 protocol for calculation of dose-rate distributions around photon-emitting brachytherapy sources. The updated protocol (TG-43U1) includes (a) a revised definition of air-kerma strength; (b) elimination of apparent activity for specification of source strength; (c) elimination of the anisotropy constant in favor of the distance-dependent one-dimensional anisotropy function; (d) guidance on extrapolating tabulated TG-43 parameters to longer and shorter distances; and (e) correction for minor inconsistencies and omissions in the original protocol and its implementation. Among the corrections are consistent guidelines for use of point- and line-source geometry functions. In addition, this report recommends a unified approach to comparing reference dose distributions derived from different investigators to develop a single critically evaluated consensus dataset as well as guidelines for performing and describing future theoretical and experimental single-source dosimetry studies. Finally, the report includes consensus datasets, in the form of dose-rate constants, radial dose functions, and one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) anisotropy functions, for all low-energy brachytherapy source models that met the AAPM dosimetric prerequisites as of July 15, 2001. These include the following I-125 sources: Amersham Health models 6702 and 6711, Best Medical model 2301, North American Scientific Inc. (NASI) model MED3631-A/M, Bebig/Theragenics model I25.S06, and the Imagyn Medical Technologies Inc. isostar model IS-12501. The Pd-103 sources included are the Theragenics Corporation model 200 and NASI model MED3633. The AAPM recommends that the revised dose-calculation protocol and revised source-specific dose-rate distributions be adopted by all end users for clinical treatment planning of low energy brachytherapy interstitial sources. Depending upon the dose-calculation protocol and parameters currently used by individual physicists, adoption of this protocol may result in changes to patient dose calculations. These changes should be carefully evaluated and reviewed with the radiation oncologist preceding implementation of the current protocol. (C) 2004 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 674
页数:42
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   DIODE DOSIMETRY OF MODEL-6711 AND MODEL-6712 I-125 SEEDS IN A WATER PHANTOM [J].
AHMAD, M ;
FONTENLA, DP ;
TSAO, STC ;
CHUI, CS ;
REIFF, JE ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
HUANG, DYC ;
SCHELL, MC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :391-399
[2]   AUTORADIOGRAPHY FOR I-125 SEEDS [J].
ALBERTI, W ;
DIVOUX, S ;
POTHMANN, B ;
TABOR, P ;
HERMANN, KP ;
HARDER, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 25 (05) :881-884
[3]  
Anderson L. L., 1990, INT BRACH PHYS BIOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], GUID EXPR UNC MEAS I
[5]  
[Anonymous], EXPT DETERMINATION D
[6]   OPTIMIZATION OF I-125 OPHTHALMIC PLAQUE BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
ASTRAHAN, MA ;
LUXTON, G ;
JOZSEF, G ;
LIGGETT, PE ;
PETROVICH, Z .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (06) :1053-1057
[7]   Measurements and Monte Carlo calculations to determine the absolute detector response of radiochromic film for brachytherapy dosimetry [J].
Bohm, TD ;
Pearson, DW ;
Das, RK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (02) :142-146
[8]  
Briesmeister J. F., 1997, MCNP A GEN MONTE CAR
[9]  
Briesmeister JF., 2000, MCNP A GEN MONTE CAR
[10]   Anisotropy functions for low energy interstitial brachytherapy sources:: an EGS4 Monte Carlo study [J].
Capote, R ;
Mainegra, E ;
López, E .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (01) :135-150