Environmental-Economic Assessment of the Pressure Swing Adsorption Biogas Upgrading Technology

被引:38
作者
Kohlheb, Norbert [1 ]
Wluka, Mathias [2 ]
Bezama, Alberto [1 ]
Thraen, Daniela [1 ,3 ]
Aurich, Andreas [1 ]
Mueller, Roland Arno [1 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Eins Energie Sachsen GmbH & Co KG, PB 411468, D-09030 Chemnitz, Germany
[3] Deutsch Biomasseforschugszentrum gGmbH DBFZ, Torgauer Str 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Biogas upgrading; Pressure swing adsorption; Life-cycle sustainability assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12155-020-10205-9
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A large-scale biogas upgrading plant using the CarboTech (R) technology with a treatment capacity of 1333 Nm(3) biogas per hour was analyzed. Our scope of evaluation encompasses all technology steps that are necessary for upgrading biogas, i.e., both pretreatment and biogas upgrade. A cradle-to-gate life-cycle and life-cycle cost assessment (LCA and LCCA) methodology was used with the functional unit (FU) of 1 Nm(3) of biogas upgraded in order to ease comparison with other biogas upgrading technologies. The calculation was made using the GaBi8 LCA software and databases of GaBi Professional, Construction materials, Food&Feed, and the ecoinvent3. We applied the CML characterization model with all its mid-point indicators. The mid-point indicators of the CML characterization model were aggregated after normalization by the CML2001 - Jan.2016 normalization factors. The normalized environmental impact was 541.74 center dot 10(-15)/Nm(3) raw biogas. The highest environmental impacts were the marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential (15.705 kg dichlorobenzene-equiv./Nm(3) raw biogas), the abiotic depletion potential (1.037 MJ/Nm(3) raw biogas), and global warming potential (0.113 kg CO2-equiv./Nm(3) raw biogas). The unit production cost of the PSA technology was 0.05-0.063 euro/Nm(3) raw biogas. The most considerable source of expenses was the operational cost from which 77% was spent on electricity. The initial investment, personal costs, and the reinvestment amounted to only 34% of the total costs for the whole life cycle. Strategies to lower the environmental burden of the PSA technology are to use green electricity and to optimize the size of the plant in order to reduce unnecessary material flows of building material and their indirect energy use. This can also lower investment expenditures while automatization and remote control may spare personnel costs.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 909
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adler P, 2014, Leitfaden Biogasaufbereitung und einspeisung
[2]   Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives [J].
Angelidaki, Irini ;
Treu, Laura ;
Tsapekos, Panagiotis ;
Luo, Gang ;
Campanaro, Stefano ;
Wenzel, Henrik ;
Kougias, Panagiotis G. .
BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2018, 36 (02) :452-466
[3]  
Beil M, 2012, Biomethan
[4]  
Bernardes M.A.D.S., 2011, Biofuel's engineering process technology
[5]   Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) :437-451
[6]   A socio-economic analysis of biomethane in the transport sector: The case of Italy [J].
D'Adamo, Idiano ;
Falcone, Pasquale Marcello ;
Ferella, Francesco .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 95 :102-115
[7]   Understanding the effects of the origin, occurrence, monitoring, control, fate and removal of siloxanes on the energetic valorization of sewage biogas-A review [J].
de Arespacochaga, N. ;
Valderrama, C. ;
Raich-Montiu, J. ;
Crest, M. ;
Mehta, S. ;
Cortina, J. L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 52 :366-381
[8]  
De Hullu J.I.W. J.a.M., 2008, COMP DIFFERENT BIOGA
[9]   Energy use of biogas hampered by the presence of siloxanes [J].
Dewil, R ;
AppelS, L ;
BaeyenS, J .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (13-14) :1711-1722
[10]  
Edenhofer O, 2012, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOU, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.115